Ralph, I've pushed to that PR with updated release notes based on what I could 
grok from prior commits, basically:

- update to support netstandard2.0 & project restructuring
- address LOG4NET-559 (adds null checks to prevent some reported issues with 
custom appenders)
- address LOG4NET-563, which doesn't really affect the package release, looks 
like the commit was to update the site styling to be in line with log4j

I only made the first listed change myself -- the others were largely due to 
the efforts of Stephan Bodewig and Dominik Psenner.

-d

On 2020/08/26 19:43:46, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Ralph

I've figured out part of the problem: I updated the .gitignore as part of the 
build / maintenance update & the default gitignore rule for vs projects 
excludes folders called 'release', which left out release docs from the site. 
I've copied in from the develop branch and updated the gitignore so I can push 
them. I can see release notes now, so I'll scour the git log and see if I can 
make a reasonable attempt at release notes for 2.0.9

-d

On 2020/08/26 19:30:26, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
If you have moved them back I can take a look this evening when I have some 
time.

Ralph

> On Aug 26, 2020, at 10:22 AM, Davyd McColl wrote:
>
> I've raised a PR in the interim: all I've done is move the site assets back 
> where they belong (I inadvertently moved them out when refactoring for 
> build!). I have a lot to learn to understand what maven is doing, so right 
> now, I'm not very clued up as to why a lot of links in the generated output 
> (eg releases) are broken (target html is missing). For all I know, the 
> targets _should_ be missing? ie, they're maintained by hand? I dunno.
>
> -d
>
> On 2020/08/26 18:18:15, Davyd McColl wrote:
> update: I have the site building with maven, but a _lot_ of the links are 
> broken (target html file is missing), so I'm going to have to hunt those 
> down. I'm also not sure how a changelog ends up in the site, since the 
> changes folder doesn't seem to e referenced (that I could find via a quick 
> text-search).
>
> I'll report back when I have something that works.
>
> -d
>
> On 2020/08/26 17:26:18, Davyd McColl wrote:
> Thanks Ralph, will give that all a go tonight!
> -d
>
> On August 26, 2020 17:24:40 Ralph Goers wrote:
> Building the site should just require running
> mvn site
> in the home directory of the log4net project. To get it somewhere you can 
> view you can then do
> mvn site:stage -DstagingDirectory=$HOME/log4net
> Once you have a site you are happy with the instructions on the link Matt 
> gave you will tell you how to update the public site.
> But first you have to get the site build working again.
> Ralph
> On Aug 26, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Actually, I can handle the main web site. I just need the Log4Net site 
> updated. From what I can tell it uses the Maven site plugin. That requires 
> files in the src/site and src/changes directory that were present in the 
> 2.0.8 release but seem to have been moved to src/Log4Net/site where they will 
> no longer work.
> Ralph
> On Aug 26, 2020, at 8:06 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I think these instructions are still up to date:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LOGGING/Managing+the+Logging+Services+Web+Site
>  
> [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LOGGING/Managing+the+Logging+Services+Web+Site]
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 10:02, Davyd McColl wrote:
>
>
> Ralph, I'm happy to -- but I have no idea how to. Even a pointer at a 
> document I can read on how would be greatly appreciated (ie how to get 
> content to the website)
> -d
> On 2020/08/26 16:54:46, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Davyd, Can you update the web site? It still says Log4Net is dormant and does 
> not include any info about 2.0.0. The PMC is continuing to get queries since 
> there is no public info about the release.
> Ralph
> On Aug 24, 2020, at 3:31 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> All the NuGet emails are forwarded to the Logging PMC. We are getting 
> requests to see the changes between 2.0.8 and 2.0.9. In the future I would 
> suggest we not push to NuGet until the web site is updated. To avoid this.
> Ralph
> --
> Matt Sicker


Reply via email to