Well, I use Eclipse, so... I won't be using whatever this does or when it does it.
Gary On Mon, Nov 6, 2023, 3:00 AM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 19:44, Matt Sicker <m...@musigma.org> wrote: > > > > Alright, after looking at the differences, I’m strongly in favor of the > Palantir version. The differences in how it handles lambdas solves one of > the main complaints I ever had about the Google version. > > The only disadvantage of the Palantir version is that it does not > provide/support an Eclipse plugin: > https://github.com/palantir/palantir-java-format/issues/833 > > The code for Eclipse is still there, it just isn't published anywhere > (AFAIK): > https://github.com/palantir/palantir-java-format/tree/develop/eclipse_plugin > > Gary, would it be a big inconvenience using Palantir instead of the > Google AOSP format? > > Piotr >