Well, I use Eclipse, so... I won't be using whatever this does or when it
does it.

Gary

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023, 3:00 AM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 19:44, Matt Sicker <m...@musigma.org> wrote:
> >
> > Alright, after looking at the differences, I’m strongly in favor of the
> Palantir version. The differences in how it handles lambdas solves one of
> the main complaints I ever had about the Google version.
>
> The only disadvantage of the Palantir version is that it does not
> provide/support an Eclipse plugin:
> https://github.com/palantir/palantir-java-format/issues/833
>
> The code for Eclipse is still there, it just isn't published anywhere
> (AFAIK):
> https://github.com/palantir/palantir-java-format/tree/develop/eclipse_plugin
>
> Gary, would it be a big inconvenience using Palantir instead of the
> Google AOSP format?
>
> Piotr
>

Reply via email to