[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868909#action_12868909
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2468:
--------------------------------------------
bq. Basically, it does not work with your change and it using a cached filter.
I'm still confused :) My patch has your test case (which uses
ConstantScoreQuery). I tweaked the test case a bit, eg to not rely on
TermsFilter (which is in contrib).
The test failed when I first made the change (as expected).
Then I modified CachingWrapperFilter to take the optional boolean
"enforceDeletions".
Then I changed the test to pass "true" for enforceDeletions, and the test now
passes.
I don't think any change is needed to ConstantScoreQuery? (Ie, I took the
"less invasive" option in my comment above).
> reopen on NRT reader should share readers w/ unchanged segments
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2468
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: CacheTest.java, LUCENE-2468.patch, LUCENE-2468.patch
>
>
> A repoen on an NRT reader doesn't seem to share readers for those segments
> that are unchanged.
> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/9f0335d480d2e637/nrt_and_caching_based_on_indexreader
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
