[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12910598#action_12910598
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--------------------------------------
bq. Whatever you call it (using Factory is fine) but isn't that what you
mentioned to be insufficient? I mean this is something you would pass to a
FieldCache.getXXX, right?
I was suggesting handling it the same way as FieldCache.Parser - it's set on
the SortField. But instead of just being able to control parsing of a term
(which is too limited), it needs to be able to control everything. (This would
solve Shai's needs too)
> FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2649
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch,
> LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch
>
>
> The FieldCache returns an array representing the values for each doc.
> However there is no way to know if the doc actually has a value.
> This should be changed to return an object representing the values *and* a
> BitSet for all valid docs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
