[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13896039#comment-13896039
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5440:
------------------------------------
I don't think we should deprecate anything. We can simply rename it - it's an
internal class... If we rename it, I think we should just rename it to
Int/LongBitSet. The word Fixed should not be there, I doubt if it was if we
didn't have OpenBitSet. That that it's fixed is a given, and documented. I
don't mind renaming it, as I said it's just a rote rename. Perhaps I should
name the Long bit set LongBitSet (remove Fixed), to avoid renames in the future.
> Add LongFixedBitSet and replace usage of OpenBitSet
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5440
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Attachments: LUCENE-5440.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch,
> LUCENE-5440.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from here: http://lucene.markmail.org/thread/35gw3amo53dsqsqj. I
> wrote a LongFixedBitSet which behaves like FixedBitSet, only allows managing
> more than 2.1B bits. It overcome some issues I've encountered with
> OpenBitSet, such as the use of set/fastSet as well the implementation of
> DocIdSet. I'll post a patch shortly and describe it in more detail.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
