[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13896282#comment-13896282
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5440:
---------------------------------------

Thanks,
I think the @lucene.internal on FixedBitSet is a bug, the javadoc tag should be 
removed. Without that class it is impossible to external users to implement 
their own Filter. Not even DocIdBitSet is available anymore, which could be 
used on top of a java.util.BitSet.

> Add LongFixedBitSet and replace usage of OpenBitSet
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5440
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/search
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Shai Erera
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5440.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch, 
> LUCENE-5440.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from here: http://lucene.markmail.org/thread/35gw3amo53dsqsqj. I 
> wrote a LongFixedBitSet which behaves like FixedBitSet, only allows managing 
> more than 2.1B bits. It overcome some issues I've encountered with 
> OpenBitSet, such as the use of set/fastSet as well the implementation of 
> DocIdSet. I'll post a patch shortly and describe it in more detail.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to