Guys, I don't think we will ever get to the point where there is not a bug. But we have to draw a line here. If we respin I have to step back as the RM since I just can't spend more than 7 days on this. I think there should be a 4.7.1 at some point where you can get your bugs fixed as everybody else but we have to draw a line here. I think I am going to draw it here with the 3 +1 I am having.
simon On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Question here. Shouldn't SOLR-5762 be fixed before 4.7? My understanding is > that if not, Solr 4.7 won't be able to work with SolrJ from 4.6.1 or > earlier? > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> And I think it should be under optimizations not changes in behavior. >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Martijn v Groningen >> <martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Only spotted a small docs typo in the Lucene CHANGES.txt, the second >>> issue under "Changes in Runtime Behavior" should be LUCENE-5399 instead of >>> LUCENE-4399. >>> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
