I volunteer to be 4.7.1 RM. I’d prefer to delay the 4.7.0 release to include all known bugfixes, though.
Simon, if you’re okay with it, I could take over as 4.7.0 RM and handle any respins. If not, it’s your prerogative to continue with the current RC vote; others can express their opinions by voting. I’m sure it’ll be fine either way. Steve On Feb 21, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, I don't think we will ever get to the point where there is not a > bug. But we have to draw a line here. If we respin I have to step back > as the RM since I just can't spend more than 7 days on this. I think > there should be a 4.7.1 at some point where you can get your bugs > fixed as everybody else but we have to draw a line here. I think I am > going to draw it here with the 3 +1 I am having. > > simon > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe > <tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Question here. Shouldn't SOLR-5762 be fixed before 4.7? My understanding is >> that if not, Solr 4.7 won't be able to work with SolrJ from 4.6.1 or >> earlier? >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> And I think it should be under optimizations not changes in behavior. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Martijn v Groningen >>> <martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Only spotted a small docs typo in the Lucene CHANGES.txt, the second >>>> issue under "Changes in Runtime Behavior" should be LUCENE-5399 instead of >>>> LUCENE-4399. >>>> >>>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
