By the way, I think that I can drop that parameter within a custom UpdateRequestProcessor?
2014-05-22 17:32 GMT+03:00 Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com>: > Hi Alexandre; > > Actually I do not want to skip them. I just want to drop commitWithin > parameter. It seems that I have to customize Solr for it. I think that it > would be nice if commitWithin had been only query parameter instead of > sending such kind of information within data too. > > Thanks; > Furkan KAMACI > > > 2014-05-22 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>: > > Can you have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor in the chain that just >> skips processing such requests? >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ >> Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr >> proficiency >> >> >> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi; >> > >> > As you know that commitWithin is a nice feature for Solr. You can >> either use >> > it via URL as a query parameter or within documents to index. As like: >> > >> > {"add":{ >> > "doc":{"id":"change.me","title":"change.me >> "},"boost":1.0,"overwrite":true,"commitWithin":1000}} >> > >> > However I think that is is not a feature of data and it should not be >> > permitted within data to index. >> > >> > I have a use case for it: I have designed an infrastructure that drops >> url >> > parameters that is not related to data (as like commit or commitWithin). >> > However as Solr supports a non-data related feature within data as a >> meta >> > data I could not drop it and I have to analyze all data or customize >> Solr. >> > >> > What do you think about that? Does it a good design to allow something >> like >> > that within data as meta data? >> > >> > Thanks; >> > Furkan KAMACI >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >
