+1 on RC3. My usual battery of manual tests worked as expected.
— Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect http://www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/> > On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > > Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0. > > The artifacts can be downloaded here: > http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987 > > <http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987> > > Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987 > > <http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987> > > As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either > manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to > Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the > VOTE thread for RC2. > > I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a > blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the > issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not inclined > to make those changes to 5.0. > > Here's my +1: > > SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366] > > -- > Anshum Gupta > http://about.me/anshumgupta <http://about.me/anshumgupta>
