+1 SUCCESS! [1:14:31.453723]
I used a new version of my multi-retry smoke tester patch. 11 requests required more than 2 attempts to succeed. 66 requests failed due to timeout. I’ll post a new patch on LUCENE-6231 shortly. Steve > On Feb 17, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 on RC3. My usual battery of manual tests worked as expected. > > > — > Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect > http://www.lucidworks.com > > > > >> On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: >> >> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0. >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded here: >> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987 >> >> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987 >> >> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either >> manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to >> Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the >> VOTE thread for RC2. >> >> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a >> blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the >> issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not inclined >> to make those changes to 5.0. >> >> Here's my +1: >> >> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366] >> >> -- >> Anshum Gupta >> http://about.me/anshumgupta > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org