+1

SUCCESS! [1:14:31.453723]

I used a new version of my multi-retry smoke tester patch.  11 requests 
required more than 2 attempts to succeed.  66 requests failed due to timeout.  
I’ll post a new patch on LUCENE-6231 shortly.

Steve

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 on RC3.  My usual battery of manual tests worked as expected.   
> 
> 
> —
> Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
> http://www.lucidworks.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0.
>> 
>> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>> 
>> Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py 
>> http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987
>> 
>> As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can either 
>> manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and thanks to 
>> Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the steps in the 
>> VOTE thread for RC2.
>> 
>> I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a 
>> blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the 
>> issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not inclined 
>> to make those changes to 5.0.
>> 
>> Here's my +1:
>> 
>> SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366]
>> 
>> -- 
>> Anshum Gupta
>> http://about.me/anshumgupta
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to