Well, yes. I think that should be fine. On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Probably not worthy of a respin: I just noticed that Lucene’s CHANGES.txt > has a section for unreleased 4.10.4. > > Steve > > > On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> > wrote: > > > > Please vote for the third release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0. > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987 > > > > Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC3-rev1659987 > > > > As the latest patch for LUCENE-6231isn't in 5.0 branch yet, you can > either manually patch the 5.0 branch with the part-3 patch (like me, and > thanks to Steve) or download the RC folder and run it locally as per the > steps in the VOTE thread for RC2. > > > > I didn't wait for a final decision on LUCENE-6247, which is marked as a > blocker for 5.0 as I don't think it is a blocker really. I acknowledge the > issue and I'm totally +1 on reducing the huge download size but not > inclined to make those changes to 5.0. > > > > Here's my +1: > > > > SUCCESS! [0:37:51.308366] > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > http://about.me/anshumgupta > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Anshum Gupta http://about.me/anshumgupta
