Since the qt=dismax has specific qt fields, I would suggest we have a qt=dismax that is plain vanilla, and one that is called qt=dismaxexample with the fields.
On 2/15/11 7:01 AM, "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl >ugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994793#comm >ent-12994793 ] > >Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2363: >------------------------------------- > >ah - my bad. > >what about something more descriptive? dismax is kinda cryptic. maybe >'escaped', 'safe', or just 'query' > >Though i'm not convinced it really needs changing -- we would also need >to update all the documentation that refers to ?qt=dismax > >> Rename the example "dismax" request handler instance >> ---------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: SOLR-2363 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363 >> Project: Solr >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: Schema and Analysis >> Reporter: Jan Høydahl >> Labels: dismax, example-schema >> Attachments: SOLR-2363.patch >> >> >> It is misleading that one of the requestHandlers in the example schema >>is named the same as the queryParser "dismax". It creates confusion as >>to whether the use of defType=dismax vs qt=dismax. It would be better if >>the example requestHandler was named e.g. "dismaxexample" > >-- >This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >- >For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
