[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994817#comment-12994817
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2363:
--------------------------------------
bq: Though i'm not convinced it really needs changing – we would also need to
update all the documentation that refers to ?qt=dismax
I agree with Jan on this one. I distinctly remember having this confusion, and
I've seen it go round multiple times on the user's list. Interestingly, I can't
find anything on the Wiki where "qt=dismax" is in the text..
bq: I would suggest we have a qt=dismax that is plain vanilla,
Please no! The whole point is to avoid the confusion over qt=dismax and
defType=dismax.
> Rename the example "dismax" request handler instance
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Schema and Analysis
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Labels: dismax, example-schema
> Attachments: SOLR-2363.patch
>
>
> It is misleading that one of the requestHandlers in the example schema is
> named the same as the queryParser "dismax". It creates confusion as to
> whether the use of defType=dismax vs qt=dismax. It would be better if the
> example requestHandler was named e.g. "dismaxexample"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
