[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994837#comment-12994837
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2363:
-----------------------------------
Also we must remember that it's only (supposed to be) an EXAMPLE schema. It's
where most people start learning about Solr, request handlers and the like -
thus it should not be confusing, but rather have super-clear comments helping
the user get going.
Also, per definition, changing this in the example schema will not break
anything anywhere :)
&qt=robust or &qt=userfriendly or &qt=onesearchbox could be other alternatives?
> Rename the example "dismax" request handler instance
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Schema and Analysis
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Labels: dismax, example-schema
> Attachments: SOLR-2363.patch
>
>
> It is misleading that one of the requestHandlers in the example schema is
> named the same as the queryParser "dismax". It creates confusion as to
> whether the use of defType=dismax vs qt=dismax. It would be better if the
> example requestHandler was named e.g. "dismaxexample"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
