I may have added a test just now, but I and others have been using this [simple] code for some time now. It has "baked", it doesn't need more baking IMO. If this patch wasn't the biggest reason to not use distributed search (a key feature) then I wouldn't be here arguing my point. But I've apparently lost this argument already so I give up;... assign if for 3.2 if that's the best you can do Rob. It's better than being unassigned which is what it is now.
~ David ________________________________________ From: Robert Muir [rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 10:24 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Please mark distributed date faceting for 3.1 On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote: > Distributed date faceting now has a patch and is tested: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709 > > I’m posting to the dev list because I want a committer to mark this for > 3.1. I don’t want to assume any of you guys see the comment activity. Thanks very much for adding a test! But, can't we just do this for 3.2 instead? I don't like the idea of rushing features into 3.1 at the last minute because we are nearing a release (0 open lucene issues, 2 open solr ones). Right now the 3.x branch is feature-frozen for 3.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
