Oh, nevermind -- I think I know why: License GNU Library or Lesser General Public License version 2.0 (LGPLv2)
D. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > It'd be cool to actually reintegrate ancient CVS history as well (I > think not all of it was moved to SVN). > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/lucene/ > > D. > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >> Even if we moved to git and did an svn rm on >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev, the entire history of Lucene >> would remain in the ASF Subversion repository. Nothing we can do to prevent >> that!! >> >> Upayavira >> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 09:26 PM, Gus Heck wrote: >> >> If we moved to git would a read only svn for older versions still exist? If >> so no reason to keep any jars at all in git. >> >> On Dec 4, 2015 4:22 PM, "Robert Muir" <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> [...] several GBs unless we remove those JARs from our history. >>> >>> 1) History is important, don't dump it. >> >> I don't think jar files are 'history' and it was a mistake we had so >> many in source control before we cleaned that up. it is much better >> without them. >> >> this bloats the repository, makes clone slow for someone new who just >> wants to check it out to work on it, etc. >> >> I wouldn't be surprised if it contributes to the system resources >> issue at hand: which impacts *real history* >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
