Always nice to be patient and accommodating for reroll 1. You know, since we are all friends here. Best to get picky later on.
Mark On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 9:27 PM david.w.smi...@gmail.com < david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Clearly to me, the facet bug is a critical one to get into the release > (and so is index corruption) and I'm glad it was caught in time to make it > into this release. I think these are the only "critical" issues I'm aware > of so I'm not concerned about "the floodgates opening" unless I hear of > other clearly non-critical issues jump on too. > > Thanks for doing the release Adrien! > ~ David > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:24 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> bq: How is this issue critical? >> >> Well, a heck of a lot of clients I deal with use facets to do analysis >> of their corpi, think of it as "poor man's stats". To tell them that >> "well, the facet counts will not be accurate sometimes" is a tough >> pill to swallow. >> >> Where we're at with this is essentially telling Solr users "skip all >> 5.3 and 5.4 versions if you want your facet counts to be accurate". >> Which sets the bar for releasing a 5.5 I guess. >> >> That said I can deal with some fuzziness on facet counts, but I really >> can't deal with index corruption so I guess it's a judgement call. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I don't think we should open the floodgates. How is this issue critical? >> > >> > We need to get the index corruption fix out. +1 to release as is. >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Ramkumar R. Aiyengar >> > <andyetitmo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I missed the initial RC, but if we are going to re-spin (and looks like >> >> Yonik has a patch up now), I would like to back-port SOLR-8418. Should >> be >> >> fairly benign, let me know if there are any concerns.. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Thanks Yonik, let's see what this bug boils down to and how quickly >> we can >> >>> get it fixed. >> >>> >> >>> Le ven. 15 janv. 2016 à 17:15, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >>>> >> >>>> We've discovered a very serious bug, currently unknown how deep it >> >>>> runs, but may make sense to respin if we can get it ironed out >> quickly >> >>>> enough: >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8496 >> >>>> >> >>>> -Yonik >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1 >> >>>> > >> >>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.4.1-RC1-rev1724447/ >> >>>> > >> >>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.4.1-RC1-rev1724447/ >> >>>> > >> >>>> > The smoke tester already passed for me both with the local and >> remote >> >>>> > artifacts, so here is my +1. >> >>>> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Not sent from my iPhone or my Blackberry or anyone else's >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com > -- - Mark about.me/markrmiller
