: The source is because I *think* we are required by the ASF to have yes. we are.
: source for a release (but we can have as many other artifacts as we : want to). Otherwise I'd say "yeah, dump the source release, use svn". : Providing source releases as opposed to git or svn URLs is getting : close to being an anachronism. svn is a work in progress, svn tags can be moved. signed release artifacts are the only true release. these things aren't really subject to debate -- they are what they are. the only question is how the tutorial should be available to people who download a source relase: I arguee that we should include the prebuilt versions, you argue that the source release should mimic what you get if you do an svn export -- since the prebuilt HTML/PDF files are what you get if you do an svn export, we have no disagreement. -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
