[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15184146#comment-15184146 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7056: --------------------------------------------------------- Commit f7f81c3284cb855136c4e468b6e1f73cf58ced4c in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from [~dsmiley] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=f7f81c3 ] LUCENE-7056: Geo3D package re-org > Spatial3d/Geo3d should have zero runtime dependencies > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-7056 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7056 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: modules/spatial3d > Reporter: David Smiley > Assignee: David Smiley > Fix For: 6.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE_7056__split_spatial3d_package.patch, > LUCENE_7056__split_spatial3d_package.patch > > > This is a proposal for the "spatial3d" module to be purely about the > shape/geometry implementations it has. In Lucene 5 that's actually all it > has. In Lucene 6 at the moment its ~76 files have 2 classes that I think > should go elsewhere: Geo3DPoint and PointInGeo3DShapeQuery. Specifically > lucene-spatial-extras (which doesn't quite exist yet so lucene-spatial) would > be a suitable place due to the dependency. _Eventually_ I see this module > migrating elsewhere be it on its own or a part of something else more > spatial-ish. Even if that never comes to pass, non-Lucene users who want to > use this module for it's geometry annoyingly have to exclude the Lucene > dependencies that are there because this module also contains these two > classes. > In a comment I'll suggest some specifics. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org