Even for a trivial class, +1 to going to the commons version if it doesn't include a new dependency.
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I probably made the Solr one. I don't know what else existed and didn't look > - if I remember right, someone committed a Pair reference that came from a > library not included on all platforms and I just made the class to fix the > build since it's about 10 lines of boiler plate. > > - Mark > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:07 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> >> Steve Davids wrote on another email thread: Though, out of curiosity why >> not just use the Pair class in Apache Commons-Lang? >> >> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/apidocs/org/apache/commons/lang3/tuple/Pair.html >> >> I'd be +1 to switching over to org.apache.commons.lang3.tuple.Pair - it >> seems possible now, perhaps the commons class didn't exist when the solr >> variant was first created? >> >> Christine > > -- > - Mark > about.me/markrmiller --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
