Or upgrade commons-lang.... On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 5/5/2016 10:38 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: >> Even for a trivial class, +1 to going to the commons version if it >> doesn't include a new dependency. > > Solr currently has commons-lang 2.6 as a dependency. The class > mentioned in the subject says "lang3" ... so I think that would be a new > dependency. It would probably coexist with 2.6, but adding another 2 > megabytes to the download size for a trivial class does not seem like a > good idea. > > Shawn > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
