I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in to that branch as well.
Erick On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading to > unstable state in Solr. > > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests. > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-). > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm >> bells too loudly :-) >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. >>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. >>> >>> -- >>> Anshum Gupta >> >> -- >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com > > > > > -- > Anshum Gupta --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
