Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in > to that branch as well. > > Erick > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading > to > > unstable state in Solr. > > > > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests. > > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-). > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for > those > >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm > >> bells too loudly :-) > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it > >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. > >>> > >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, > >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Anshum Gupta > >> > >> -- > >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
