Github user dsmiley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/275#discussion_r153387514
--- Diff: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/schema/FieldType.java ---
@@ -905,6 +905,7 @@ protected void checkSupportsDocValues() {
protected static final String ENABLE_GRAPH_QUERIES =
"enableGraphQueries";
private static final String ARGS = "args";
private static final String POSITION_INCREMENT_GAP =
"positionIncrementGap";
+ protected static final String SCORE_OVERLAPS = "scoreOverlaps";
--- End diff --
I need to correct you one one point: Solr has had a syntax for per-field
query parameters for a long time. The syntax is `f.fieldName.parameterName`
e.g. `f.title.hl.snippets` SolrJ's SolrParams has convenience methods for
this on the implementation side. Perhaps you overlooked this because most users
only use it in the context of faceting parameters, even though it's certainly
not unique to faceting (as in the example above for highlighting). I'm not
aware of any query parser that uses it yet but they certainly could.
Any way, I suppose even if we agree we'd like some query time
customizability of this (and other settings), it would still be nice to
establish a default fallback on the FieldType.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
