OK, it looks like all changes that we wanted to be included are now in? Please let me know if there is still something left to include in 7.2 before building a RC.
I noticed SOLR-11423 is in a weird state, it is included in the changelog in 7.1 but has only been committed to master. Did we forget to backport it? Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 21:13, Andrzej Białecki < [email protected]> a écrit : > On 6 Dec 2017, at 18:45, Andrzej Białecki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I attached the patch to SOLR-11714, which disables the ‘searchRate’ > trigger - if there are no objections I’ll commit it shortly to branch_7.2. > > > > This has been committed now to branch_7_2 and I don’t have any other open > issues for 7.2. Thanks! > > > > On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:51, Andrzej Białecki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:35, Andrzej Białecki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > SOLR-11458 is committed and resolved - thanks for the patience. > > > > Actually, one more thing … ;) SOLR-11714 is a more serious bug in a new > feature (searchRate autoscaling trigger). It’s probably best to disable > this feature in 7.2 rather than releasing a broken version, so I’d like to > commit a patch that disables it (plus a note in CHANGES.txt). > > > > > On 6 Dec 2017, at 14:02, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up, Anshum. > > This leaves us with only SOLR-11458 to wait for before building a RC > (which might be ready but just not marked as resolved). > > > > Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 13:47, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> Hi Adrien, >> I'm planning to skip SOLR-11624 for this release (as per my last comment >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11624?focusedCommentId=16280121&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16280121). >> If someone has an objection, please let me know; otherwise, please feel >> free to proceed with the release. >> I'll continue working on it anyway, and shall try to have it ready for >> the next release. >> Thanks, >> Ishan >> >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> FYI I created the new branch for 7.2, so you will have to backport to >>> this branch. No hurry though, I mostly created the branch so that it's fine >>> to cherry-pick changes that may wait for 7.3 to be released. >>> >>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>>> Sorry to hear that Ishan, I hope you are doing better now. +1 to get >>>> SOLR-11624 in. >>>> >>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 07:57, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> I was a bit unwell over the weekend and yesterday; I'm working on a >>>>> very targeted fix for SOLR-11624 right now; I expect it to take another >>>>> 5-6 >>>>> hours. >>>>> Is that fine with you, Adrien? If not, please go ahead with the >>>>> release, and I'll volunteer later for a bugfix release for this after 7.2 >>>>> is out. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Fine with me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Adrien, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple of >>>>>>> weeks ago and has been reviewed but never got committed. I've run all >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> tests twice as well to verify. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close to >>>>>>>> the RC build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the code to >>>>>>>> review it >>>>>>>> to make sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure I’ll do this - thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Adrien, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this >>>>>>>>> significantly reduces the chance of accidental data loss when using >>>>>>>>> MoveReplicaCmd. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Quick update: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been >>>>>>>>> merged, they will be in 7.2. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some cases >>>>>>>>> but I don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to hold the >>>>>>>>> release on it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <[email protected]> a >>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 this is over due >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ >>>>>>>>>> QUEEN VIC) <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137 >>>>>>>>>>> included in the release. Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Christine >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From: [email protected] At: 12/01/17 10:11:59 >>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we >>>>>>>>>>> accumulated a good set of changes, so I think we should release >>>>>>>>>>> Lucene/Solr >>>>>>>>>>> 7.2.0. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is one change that I would like to have before building a >>>>>>>>>>> RC: LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be >>>>>>>>>>> merged. >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any other changes that should make >>>>>>>>>>> it to >>>>>>>>>>> the release. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of >>>>>>>>>>> building the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >> > > > >
