We have another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8090.
Could someone help Varun investigate https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11740? I just made it a blocker as well until we know more about it. Le sam. 9 déc. 2017 à 08:57, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in> a écrit : > This fails for me every single time : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11740 > > Can someone with more knowledge of the bin/solr script confirm if this > effects the "-e cloud" command only or is it more widespread . > That might help determine if we want to fix this before the release. > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> FYI we are backporting SOLR-11423 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423> to 7.2 so I'll build >> a RC on Monday (assuming it will have been backported by then). >> >> Le jeu. 7 déc. 2017 à 20:17, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >>> OK, it looks like all changes that we wanted to be included are now in? >>> Please let me know if there is still something left to include in 7.2 >>> before building a RC. >>> >>> I noticed SOLR-11423 is in a weird state, it is included in the >>> changelog in 7.1 but has only been committed to master. Did we forget to >>> backport it? >>> >>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 21:13, Andrzej Białecki < >>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> a écrit : >>> >>>> On 6 Dec 2017, at 18:45, Andrzej Białecki < >>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I attached the patch to SOLR-11714, which disables the ‘searchRate’ >>>> trigger - if there are no objections I’ll commit it shortly to branch_7.2. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This has been committed now to branch_7_2 and I don’t have any other >>>> open issues for 7.2. Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:51, Andrzej Białecki < >>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:35, Andrzej Białecki < >>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> SOLR-11458 is committed and resolved - thanks for the patience. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Actually, one more thing … ;) SOLR-11714 is a more serious bug in a new >>>> feature (searchRate autoscaling trigger). It’s probably best to disable >>>> this feature in 7.2 rather than releasing a broken version, so I’d like to >>>> commit a patch that disables it (plus a note in CHANGES.txt). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6 Dec 2017, at 14:02, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks for the heads up, Anshum. >>>> >>>> This leaves us with only SOLR-11458 to wait for before building a RC >>>> (which might be ready but just not marked as resolved). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 13:47, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Hi Adrien, >>>>> I'm planning to skip SOLR-11624 for this release (as per my last >>>>> comment >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11624?focusedCommentId=16280121&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16280121). >>>>> If someone has an objection, please let me know; otherwise, please feel >>>>> free to proceed with the release. >>>>> I'll continue working on it anyway, and shall try to have it ready for >>>>> the next release. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ishan >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FYI I created the new branch for 7.2, so you will have to backport to >>>>>> this branch. No hurry though, I mostly created the branch so that it's >>>>>> fine >>>>>> to cherry-pick changes that may wait for 7.3 to be released. >>>>>> >>>>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry to hear that Ishan, I hope you are doing better now. +1 to get >>>>>>> SOLR-11624 in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 07:57, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I was a bit unwell over the weekend and yesterday; I'm working on a >>>>>>>> very targeted fix for SOLR-11624 right now; I expect it to take >>>>>>>> another 5-6 >>>>>>>> hours. >>>>>>>> Is that fine with you, Adrien? If not, please go ahead with the >>>>>>>> release, and I'll volunteer later for a bugfix release for this after >>>>>>>> 7.2 >>>>>>>> is out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fine with me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in> a >>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Adrien, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple of >>>>>>>>>> weeks ago and has been reviewed but never got committed. I've run >>>>>>>>>> all the >>>>>>>>>> tests twice as well to verify. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki < >>>>>>>>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close to >>>>>>>>>>> the RC build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the code to >>>>>>>>>>> review it >>>>>>>>>>> to make sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sure I’ll do this - thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki < >>>>>>>>>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Adrien, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this >>>>>>>>>>>> significantly reduces the chance of accidental data loss when using >>>>>>>>>>>> MoveReplicaCmd. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Quick update: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been >>>>>>>>>>>> merged, they will be in 7.2. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some >>>>>>>>>>>> cases but I don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to >>>>>>>>>>>> hold the >>>>>>>>>>>> release on it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 this is over due >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <va...@vthacker.in> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke >>>>>>>>>>>>> (BLOOMBERG/ QUEEN VIC) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to see >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137 included in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release. Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christine >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 12/01/17 10:11:59 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated a good set of changes, so I think we should release >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lucene/Solr >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.2.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is one change that I would like to have before building >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a RC: LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any other changes that should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> make it to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of building the first release candidate next wednesday, December >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6th. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >
