Github user dsmiley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/455#discussion_r224306158
--- Diff:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/RealTimeGetComponent.java
---
@@ -639,12 +650,30 @@ public static SolrInputDocument
getInputDocument(SolrCore core, BytesRef idBytes
sid = new SolrInputDocument();
} else {
Document luceneDocument = docFetcher.doc(docid);
- sid = toSolrInputDocument(luceneDocument,
core.getLatestSchema());
+ sid = toSolrInputDocument(luceneDocument, schema);
}
- if (onlyTheseNonStoredDVs != null) {
- docFetcher.decorateDocValueFields(sid, docid,
onlyTheseNonStoredDVs);
- } else {
- docFetcher.decorateDocValueFields(sid, docid,
docFetcher.getNonStoredDVsWithoutCopyTargets());
+ ensureDocDecorated(onlyTheseNonStoredDVs, sid, docid, docFetcher,
resolveBlock || schema.hasExplicitField(IndexSchema.NEST_PATH_FIELD_NAME));
+ SolrInputField rootField;
+ if(resolveBlock && schema.isUsableForChildDocs() && (rootField =
sid.getField(IndexSchema.ROOT_FIELD_NAME))!=null) {
+ // doc is part of a nested structure
+ ModifiableSolrParams params = new ModifiableSolrParams()
+ .set("q",
core.getLatestSchema().getUniqueKeyField().getName()+ ":"
+rootField.getFirstValue())
--- End diff --
It seems the LocalSolrQueryRequest here is a dummy needed to satisfy some
of the methods below. This threw me; there should be comments and/or choice of
var names (e.g. dummyReq) to reflect this. "q" isn't needed; just the "fl".
It seems we don't even need the "fl" here since that can be supplied as the
first parameter to SolrReturnFields, which seems better if it works.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
