What you’re seeing is exactly the security level situation. Recall that it 
occurs with all issues that have a value in the Security Level field, whether 
that value is Public or Private. For all queries, if you are not logged in, you 
only see issues that have an empty value in the Security Level field. You can 
see the issues just fine if you know the ID, but they will not appear in query 
results unless you are logged in.

The 14 you see for 7.4 when not logged in have no Security Level set at all. 
All 10 of the 7.3.1 issues you can’t see unless you are logged in have a value 
in the Security Level field, Public as it happens.

One of the several draft emails I haven’t had time to send is a suggestion that 
we just simply do a bulk edit for all Public issues to remove the value 
entirely, and periodically do the same. I’d do it as often as I have time and 
remember to do it, but any of us could do it as long as we agree it’s a good 
idea.

Cassandra
On Jun 7, 2019, 5:53 AM -0500, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>, 
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to be that something is not right with JIRA. It seems somehow
> related to minor (x.y.Z) releases when looking for them in Anon mode.
> And issues that target them.
>
> Reproduction:
> 1) In Anon window, go to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12202
> 2) Click (to new window) on 7.3.1 release, which should show all
> issues fixed in 7.3.1. I get nothing in anon and 10 in logged-in
> 3) Click (to new window) on 7.4 release, and I see 14, instead of 169
>
> Same happens with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13255
> (part of 7.7.1 release).
>
> I thought maybe this was connected to Security Level situation, but
> both of these are marked public explicitly.
>
> Does anybody else sees this and/or knows whether this is some kind of
> known issue?
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>

Reply via email to