3rd time for a lot of it ;)

Yes, 7 is the latest Gradle branch and active and pushable.

I keep what one is active up to date is the jira desc.

I would not push too much complicated until I unfark settings.gradle.

Mark

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:58 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Been there, done that. And it’s totally frustrating!
>
> Just to make it totally clear to me, this is the solr-13452_gradle_7
> branch of the public repo, correct? And we all can push to it?
>
> Cheer up, it’s always faster to do it the second time ;)…
>
> In the bad old days when we didn’t have VCS and were working with “C”, the
> .c files and the compiled version .o were in the same directory. Twice in a
> week the boss typed:
>
> ‘rm * .o’
>
> rather than
>
> ‘rm *.o”
>
> deleting the source code as well. Oops.
>
>
>
> > On Oct 21, 2019, at 9:58 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > And yes, if it's not clear, I've lost 80-90% of these same work before.
> Total idiot.
> >
> > - Mark
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:56 PM Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The branch is there, certainly it can go in without me.
> >
> > It does need the settings.xml fix. When I think about timing, my main
> concern is my availability - I'll be gone nov 14 to the end of the month
> and then holidays are busy. If others want to take on the responsibility
> though, I would not stop it. Trying to get gradle in while keeping my other
> work from going stale was looking like a tall order by the 14th.
> >
> > I'm not sure what my plans are at the moment. I'm a totally idiot and
> just lost 10 days of 16-20 hours per day of work, including the
> settings.xml fix. Luckily at least that is straightforward enough to do
> again.
> >
> > As it is, I have little to no desire to do much now. I'll try and make
> that settings fix soon and then the build is not ready (dist needs work,
> dependencies need vetting, some other make sure everything is 100% stuff)
> but it can probably go in and get what it needs as we go.
> >
> > - Mark
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:49 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Going out on a limb here, as in “this may be a whacky idea but let’s
> toss it around anyway”.
> >
> > - Check in the test fixes and Gradle build in the current state to
> master/9.0 as soon as possible. Essentially let it break however it will,
> even if that means we shut off Jenkins for a while. Or only test Lucene.
> Or…..
> >
> > - Concentrate (all of us in our copious spare time) on fixing master at
> least back to the state it is today reliability-wise.
> >
> > - Cut Solr 9.0 when it’s ready. My _guess_ would be early next year.
> >
> > - Slow/stop 8x development as necessary.
> >
> > - Yes, the 8x code line will have a short life, about 1 year. Given that
> 9.0 was the first one we required Java 11, I pretty much expected that.
> >
> > I don’t have strong feelings about this proposal, so feel free to shoot
> it down. That said, if we get the work Mark has done in front of everyone,
> there’s less incentive to “just let Mark do it”. And it’s not like we’d be
> breaking the currently released version.
> >
> > Erick
> >
> > > On Oct 21, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > agree with david
> > > as your schedule gets packed there are more than a few that are
> willing to pickup the slack
> > > if the branch is checked-in and labelled we can tackle what needs to
> be done
> > > From: David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 2:13 AM
> > > To: Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: The Lucene Solr Gradle Build Game plan
> > >
> > > Thanks for your efforts Mark!
> > >
> > > Why has the migration to Gradle somehow been blocked by performance
> improvements to Solr's tests?
> > > What are the blockers to the Gradle branch being merged to master?
> It's an experimental shadow build, so... none?
> > >
> > > I appreciate you want everything to be great from the beginning but I
> think it's better to try and find that subjective line where it's good
> enough to be committed then iterated on in follow-up issues.
> > >
> > > ~ David Smiley
> > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:30 AM Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hello Dawid, I'm sorry about the absence. I had a two week trip to SF
> and that tends to steal my mind, thank god something does.
> > >
> > > Yes, I have local changes that you should likely wait for.
> > >
> > > There is a substantial issue with how I was mapping our directory
> names to project names. That issue led to allowing some funny things and so
> addressing it makes the build a bit to a lot less silly. Sorry Tomoko
> Uchida :(
> > >
> > > Anyway, I had to pause Gradle when I remembered that Solr tests are
> only slow for silly or broken reasons.
> > >
> > > So I worked on that and then I remember that about a year and a half
> ago I had realized SolrCloud was seriously rotting in come very core and
> key areas. At the time I spent a lot of effort on my Starburst branch
> addressing some fundamental problems and patterns. I then had a 6 week
> sabbatical and 3 week movie making trip. Though my own lack of care, I lost
> all that work and mostly forgot about the whole thing.
> > >
> > > Coming back to that, after wasting a lot of effort trying to find my
> previous work, I set off to duplicate that work and hopefully take it a bit
> further. I really can't work on anything unless until that is on a clear
> path to being addressed unless someone attached to my livelihood forces me.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, I'll be gone half of November on across the world vacation
> and December is always a mess.
> > >
> > > On the plus side, the gradle build has gotten some great testing, but
> I'm little fuzzy on when I'm ready. I will certainly be separating out
> these efforts. So I'll be extracting the gradle changes to the gradle
> branch and keeping my new state as a separate branch.
> > >
> > > - Mark
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Mark
> >
> > http://about.me/markrmiller
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Mark
> >
> > http://about.me/markrmiller
>
> --
- Mark

http://about.me/markrmiller

Reply via email to