Hi All,
Please help me with below error:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: unexpected docvalues type NONE for field
'case.id' (expected one of [BINARY, SORTED]). Re-index with correct docvalues
type.
at org.apache.lucene.index.DocValues.checkField(DocValues.java:317)
at org.apache.lucene.index.DocValues.getBinary(DocValues.java:352)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.join.DocValuesTermsCollector.lambda$binaryDocValues$0(DocValuesTermsCollector.java:48)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.join.DocValuesTermsCollector.doSetNextReader(DocValuesTermsCollector.java:44)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.SimpleCollector.getLeafCollector(SimpleCollector.java:33)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.join.GenericTermsCollector$2.getLeafCollector(GenericTermsCollector.java:128)
any pointers for this issue please let me know.
Thank you!
Thanks,
Jyothsna
-----Original Message-----
From: Jyothsna Bavisetti
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 2:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lucene index upgrade from 4.6 to 8 facing issue
Hi Shawn,
Any doc or links for re indexing process. We are using Lucene core 8.0.0.
Thanks,
Jyothsna
-----Original Message-----
From: Jyothsna Bavisetti
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 11:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lucene index upgrade from 4.6 to 8 facing issue
Hi Shawn,
Re-indexing is costly transaction in my use case as it takes more than three
days. Please let me know if any work around?
Thanks,
Jyothsna
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Heisey <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 11:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lucene index upgrade from 4.6 to 8 facing issue
On 9/26/2019 11:41 AM, Jyothsna Bavisetti wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade Lucene index from 4.6 to 8.0.0. When I'm trying
> to upgrade tool using:
>
> java -cp lucene-core.jar:lucene-backward-codecs.jar \
>
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexUpgrader-delete-prior-commits \
<snip>
> Please let me know any option other than reindexing.
If you're upgrading more than one major version, you must reindex.
Multiple major version upgrades have always been discouraged and never
guaranteed to work, but now such upgrades are explicitly denied.
When you used the IndexUpgrader from Lucene 6, the Lucene version was written
into the index. The recorded version was preserved by the upgrader for version
7. When the index was subsequently read by version 8, it complained because
the original index was not written by version 7 or later.
Thanks,
Shawn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional
commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
