>I use MangedResource#StorageIO and its implementations as a convenient way to 
>abstract away the underlying config storage when creating plugins that need to 
>support both, SolrCloud and Solr Standalone.

Can you give us some more details on how you use it?

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 7:32 PM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >As authentication is plugged into the SolrDispatchFilter I would assume that 
> >you would need to be authenticated to read/write Managed Resources
>
> I'm talking about the authorization plugins
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:20 PM Matthias Krueger <m...@mkr.io> wrote:
> >
> >
> > As authentication is plugged into the SolrDispatchFilter I would assume 
> > that you would need to be authenticated to read/write Managed Resources but 
> > no authorization is checked (i.e. any authenticated user can read/write 
> > them), correct?
> >
> > Anyway, I came across Managed Resources in at least two scenarios:
> >
> > The LTR plugin is using them for updating model/features.
> > I use MangedResource#StorageIO and its implementations as a convenient way 
> > to abstract away the underlying config storage when creating plugins that 
> > need to support both, SolrCloud and Solr Standalone.
> >
> > IMO an abstraction that allows distributing configuration (ML models, 
> > configuration snippets, external file fields...) that exceeds the typical 
> > ZK size limits to SolrCloud while also supporting Solr Standalone would be 
> > nice to have.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > On 12.08.20 02:08, Noble Paul wrote:
> >
> > The end point is served by restlet. So, your rules are not going to be 
> > honored. The rules work only if it is served by a Solr request handler
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020, 12:46 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Noble,
> >>
> >> Can you explain what you mean when you say it's not secured?  Just for
> >> those of us who haven't been following the discussion so far?  On the
> >> surface of things users taking advantage of our RuleBasedAuth plugin
> >> can secure this API like they can any other HTTP API.  Or are you
> >> talking about some other security aspect here?
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:55 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> > The end-point for Managed resources is not secured. So it needs to be
> >> > fixed/eliminated.
> >> >
> >> > I would like to know what is the level of adoption for that feature
> >> > and if it is a critical feature for users.
> >> >
> >> > Another possibility is to offer a replacement for the feature using a
> >> > different API
> >> >
> >> > Your feedback will help us decide on what a potential solution should be
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >> > Noble Paul
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to