So, it's not very different from directly reading a file from ZK? what benefit do you get by using the ManagedResourceStorage?
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 7:08 PM Matthias Krueger <m...@mkr.io> wrote: > > > In a custom SolrRequestHandler#handleRequest something like this: > > final ManagedResourceStorage.StorageIO storageIO = > ManagedResourceStorage.newStorageIO(core.getCoreDescriptor().getCollectionName(), > resourceLoader, new NamedList<>()); > > And then using > > storageIO.openOutputStream(resourceName) > > to store some (well-known) resources. > > Matt > > > On 15.08.20 11:38, Noble Paul wrote: > >> I use MangedResource#StorageIO and its implementations as a convenient way > >> to abstract away the underlying config storage when creating plugins that > >> need to support both, SolrCloud and Solr Standalone. > > Can you give us some more details on how you use it? > > > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 7:32 PM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> As authentication is plugged into the SolrDispatchFilter I would assume > >>> that you would need to be authenticated to read/write Managed Resources > >> I'm talking about the authorization plugins > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:20 PM Matthias Krueger <m...@mkr.io> wrote: > >>> > >>> As authentication is plugged into the SolrDispatchFilter I would assume > >>> that you would need to be authenticated to read/write Managed Resources > >>> but no authorization is checked (i.e. any authenticated user can > >>> read/write them), correct? > >>> > >>> Anyway, I came across Managed Resources in at least two scenarios: > >>> > >>> The LTR plugin is using them for updating model/features. > >>> I use MangedResource#StorageIO and its implementations as a convenient > >>> way to abstract away the underlying config storage when creating plugins > >>> that need to support both, SolrCloud and Solr Standalone. > >>> > >>> IMO an abstraction that allows distributing configuration (ML models, > >>> configuration snippets, external file fields...) that exceeds the typical > >>> ZK size limits to SolrCloud while also supporting Solr Standalone would > >>> be nice to have. > >>> > >>> Matt > >>> > >>> > >>> On 12.08.20 02:08, Noble Paul wrote: > >>> > >>> The end point is served by restlet. So, your rules are not going to be > >>> honored. The rules work only if it is served by a Solr request handler > >>> > >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020, 12:46 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Hey Noble, > >>>> > >>>> Can you explain what you mean when you say it's not secured? Just for > >>>> those of us who haven't been following the discussion so far? On the > >>>> surface of things users taking advantage of our RuleBasedAuth plugin > >>>> can secure this API like they can any other HTTP API. Or are you > >>>> talking about some other security aspect here? > >>>> > >>>> Jason > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:55 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> The end-point for Managed resources is not secured. So it needs to be > >>>>> fixed/eliminated. > >>>>> > >>>>> I would like to know what is the level of adoption for that feature > >>>>> and if it is a critical feature for users. > >>>>> > >>>>> Another possibility is to offer a replacement for the feature using a > >>>>> different API > >>>>> > >>>>> Your feedback will help us decide on what a potential solution should be > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> Noble Paul > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ----------------------------------------------------- > >> Noble Paul > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
