Thanks Mayya. I took a stab at summarizing Solr highlights in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote89
Jan > 6. jun. 2021 kl. 16:43 skrev Mayya Sharipova > <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID>: > > Hello everyone, I would appreciate help with with following for 8.9 release: > Release Highlights. I gave it a try for Lucene (but I don't have experience > to judge what qualifies as a release highlight, so please edit/remove/add). > Edits can be done here: Lucene Release Note 8.9 > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseNote89>, Solr > Release Note 8.9 > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote89>. > Resolve failures in Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9 > <http://lucene-solr-smokerelease-8.9/>, currently fails with an error: > [smoker] File > "/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > line 125, in noJavaPackageClasses > [smoker] raise RuntimeError('%s contains sheisty class "%s"' % (desc, > name2)) > [smoker] RuntimeError: JAR file > "/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/tmp/unpack/solr-8.9.0/contrib/gcs-repository/lib/jsr305-3.0.2.jar" > contains sheisty class "javax/annotation/CheckForNull.class" > > Thank you in advance. > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 9:40 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com > <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>> wrote: > SOLR-15316 / PR 2502 is now merged to branch_8_9 > > Jan > >> 3. jun. 2021 kl. 20:53 skrev Mayya Sharipova >> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID >> <mailto:mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID>>: >> >> I can wait till this PR 2502 is backported (hopefully by tomorrow? and >> hopefully will be the last item to wait for). >> And tomorrow I will try to build a RC. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:57 AM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com >> <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> It’s OK with me, but I’m not really in a position to understand the changes >> and/or test it. And while we have a branch, I’m not clear on when the first >> RC is planned, so Mayya should weigh in I think. >> >> Cassandra >> On Jun 3, 2021, 5:49 AM -0500, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com >> <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>>, wrote: >>> Mayya, Cassandra, I'd like to merge the Jetty upgrade, SOLR-15316 to >>> branch_8x and branch_8_9. See backport PR >>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2502 >>> <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2502> >>> Is that ok? >>> >>> Jan >>> >>>> 2. jun. 2021 kl. 01:00 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com >>>> <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>>: >>>> >>>> Cassandra, >>>> >>>> Thanks for spotting the Jetty JIRA (SOLR-15316 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15316>). I put up a quck PR >>>> <https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/157> for upgrading Jetty to >>>> 9.4.41.v20210516. Currently running all tests. >>>> Due to the CVEs I think there should not be a new Solr release without >>>> this upgrade. I set fixVersion to 8.9 and kept the blocker. If anyone >>>> disagrees, speak out. >>>> >>>> There's always a risk of a new Jetty version introducing new bugs, but >>>> this is a minor version upgrade with (almost) exclusively bug fixes since >>>> 9.4.36, so I'm willing to take the risk if tests look good. Perhaps >>>> Jenkins gets a few test spins on main before the 8.9 release too. Whyt >>>> Mayya? >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>>> 1. jun. 2021 kl. 23:04 skrev Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com >>>>> <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>>: >>>>> >>>>> I got a question this morning about some Jetty CVEs that look to be fixed >>>>> with Jetty 9.4.39, and there’s an issue marked as a Blocker (with no >>>>> version) to upgrade to that version. Is there time to do that for 8.9? Or >>>>> is it too high risk or would take too long? >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15316 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15316> >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, I’m way behind on mailing lists and didn’t see the branch had been >>>>> cut already! >>>>> >>>>> Cassandra >>>>> On Jun 1, 2021, 3:54 PM -0500, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com >>>>> <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>>, wrote: >>>>>> Let's not hold up the release due to this incomplete PR. It obviously >>>>>> needs more time for completion and there is always a new train to catch. >>>>>> As far as I understand, Circuit breakers are pluggable, so anyone can >>>>>> configure their own implementation in the meantime? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. jun. 2021 kl. 22:13 skrev Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:a...@apache.org>>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I appreciate you fixing this and adding the new circuit breaker and >>>>>>> look forward to having it in the hands of our users soon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However, the current state of PR, with significant API churn for a >>>>>>> single change and overlapping code is not yet ready. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If this is too much of a rework, I am happy to take the existing PR and >>>>>>> do the changes, post which I believe the PR should be close to >>>>>>> completion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let me know if you need me to help, but unfortunately, the two >>>>>>> objections I raised are blockers, atleast until we establish that they >>>>>>> cannot be done away with. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, 01:37 Walter Underwood, <wun...@wunderwood.org >>>>>>> <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>> wrote: >>>>>>> I would appreciate a second opinion on the pull request. Substantive >>>>>>> issues have been resolved. At this point, the discussion is about code >>>>>>> style and coding standards. I don’t have detailed knowledge about the >>>>>>> Solr coding style, so I’d appreciate another set of eyes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The current behavior is buggy, and we are not able to use it at Chegg. >>>>>>> The patch fixes those bugs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96 >>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wunder >>>>>>> Walter Underwood >>>>>>> wun...@wunderwood.org <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org> >>>>>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ <http://observer.wunderwood.org/> (my >>>>>>> blog) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org >>>>>>>> <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I answered the comments. I don’t see those answers on github, oddly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’ll re-answer them. Most of your questions are already answered in >>>>>>>> the discussion on Jira. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I central issues is that load average is not always a CPU measure. In >>>>>>>> some systems, it includes threads in iowait. So it is potentially >>>>>>>> misleading to label it as CPU and document it as CPU. The updated >>>>>>>> documentation makes that clear, so that should have already answered >>>>>>>> your comment. that is why it is important to rename the existing >>>>>>>> circuit breaker. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wunder >>>>>>>> Walter Underwood >>>>>>>> wun...@wunderwood.org <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org> >>>>>>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ <http://observer.wunderwood.org/> (my >>>>>>>> blog) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2021, at 12:20 PM, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org >>>>>>>>> <mailto:a...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I tool a look at the PR and gave comments for SOLR-15056, and the >>>>>>>>> last I checked, my comments were not addressed? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, 00:31 Walter Underwood, <wun...@wunderwood.org >>>>>>>>> <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Could someone else please take a look at SOLR-15056? This is a small >>>>>>>>> blast radius change that improves the circuit breakers. It includes >>>>>>>>> unit tests and documentation and has been ready since January. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96/files >>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96/files> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15056 >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15056> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wunder >>>>>>>>> Walter Underwood >>>>>>>>> wun...@wunderwood.org <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org> >>>>>>>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ <http://observer.wunderwood.org/> >>>>>>>>> (my blog) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2021, at 11:53 AM, Mayya Sharipova >>>>>>>>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the update, Houston. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've started the release process, the branch 8.9 is now cut. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:21 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:hous...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Mayya, SOLR-14978 is now in 8.x. So no longer a blocker. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:42 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dsmi...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> SOLR-15412 is rather serious as the title suggests. I haven't been >>>>>>>>>> tracking the progress so if it's already resolved, that's unknown to >>>>>>>>>> me and isn't reflected in JIRA. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ~ David Smiley >>>>>>>>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:24 PM Mayya Sharipova >>>>>>>>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>>>>>>> I wonder if everyone is ok for May 31st (Monday) as the date for the >>>>>>>>>> feature freeze date and branch cut? >>>>>>>>>> I've noticed that `releaseWizard.py` is also asking for the length >>>>>>>>>> of feature freeze. What is the custom length to put there? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looks like Lucene >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LUCENE/versions/12349562> >>>>>>>>>> doesn't have any unresolved issues for 8.9. >>>>>>>>>> SOLR >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12349563> has: >>>>>>>>>> - SOLR-15412 Strict validation on Replica metadata can cause >>>>>>>>>> complete outage (Looks like it may be resolved already?) >>>>>>>>>> - SOLR-15410 GC log is directed to console when starting Solr with >>>>>>>>>> Java 11 Open J9 on Windows >>>>>>>>>> - SOLR-15056 CPU circuit breaker needs to use CPU utilization, not >>>>>>>>>> Unix load average >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are we ok to postpone these issues to later releases if they are not >>>>>>>>>> resolved and merged before feature freeze? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:41 PM Colvin Cowie >>>>>>>>>> <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com <mailto:colvin.cowie....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> Eric was going to have a look at the PR. >>>>>>>>>> But if it isn't done in time then I don't think it needs to block >>>>>>>>>> the release >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 15:50, Mayya Sharipova >>>>>>>>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hello Colvin, >>>>>>>>>> I am wondering if you still want to merge SOLR-15410 for the >>>>>>>>>> Lucene/Solr 8.9 release? >>>>>>>>>> Should we have a deadline for feature freeze? Say May 30th (Sunday)? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:30 PM Colvin Cowie >>>>>>>>>> <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com <mailto:colvin.cowie....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > Hello, >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > I raised SOLR-15410 yesterday with a PR to fix an issue with GC >>>>>>>>>> > logging when using new versions of OpenJ9. It's small, so if >>>>>>>>>> > somebody could have a look at it in time for 8.9 that would be >>>>>>>>>> > great >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> > Colvin >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 17:52, Nhat Nguyen <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co >>>>>>>>>> > <mailto:nhat.ngu...@elastic.co>.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Hi Mayya, >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> I would like to backport LUCENE-9935, which enables bulk-merge >>>>>>>>>> >> for stored fields with index sort, to 8.x this weekend. The patch >>>>>>>>>> >> is ready, but we prefer to give CI some cycles before >>>>>>>>>> >> backporting. Please let me know if it's okay with the release >>>>>>>>>> >> plan. >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> >> Nhat >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> >> <mailto:gus.h...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> Perhaps https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378 >>>>>>>>>> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378> should be >>>>>>>>>> >>> investigated before 8.9, maybe make it a blocker? >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:35 AM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> >>> <mailto:rcm...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> Mayya, I created backport for Adrien's issue here, to try to >>>>>>>>>> >>>> help out: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495 >>>>>>>>>> >>>> <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> Personally, I felt that merging non-trivial changes from main >>>>>>>>>> >>>> branch >>>>>>>>>> >>>> to 8.x has some additional risks when cherry-picking: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> * structural changes in main branch making merging more >>>>>>>>>> >>>> difficult >>>>>>>>>> >>>> (e.g. LUCENE-9705 reorganization of codec versioning, great >>>>>>>>>> >>>> change >>>>>>>>>> >>>> moving forwards though) >>>>>>>>>> >>>> * there are many style changes due to spotless in main branch >>>>>>>>>> >>>> which >>>>>>>>>> >>>> add noise to merging against old code. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> * In the specific case of LUCENE-9827, the usual additional >>>>>>>>>> >>>> tricky >>>>>>>>>> >>>> backwards compatibility for 8.x must be added in the backport >>>>>>>>>> >>>> (due to >>>>>>>>>> >>>> minor version bumps there) which can go wrong. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> I still think that particular change is worth considering for >>>>>>>>>> >>>> 8.9, it >>>>>>>>>> >>>> isn't just a performance bug but also a huge improvement to test >>>>>>>>>> >>>> coverage that helps combat risks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> But we should still take some precautions when releasing an 8.x >>>>>>>>>> >>>> IMO: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> * be mindful of what we are backporting and the risks involved: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> it is harder. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> * try to let jenkins bake changes in 8.x branches for longer >>>>>>>>>> >>>> than >>>>>>>>>> >>>> usual? even a few days really helps. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Mayya Sharipova >>>>>>>>>> >>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co >>>>>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:mayya.sharip...@elastic.co>.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > Thanks everyone, >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > Adrien, I am happy to try to be a release manager for this >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > Adrien, and Gus, please let me know when your changes are >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > merged to 8.x >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:38 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > <mailto:gus.h...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> I'm also looking to find time to get >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597 >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597> into some >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> sort of 8x. I've recently completed the back port of 2/3 of >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> the lucene tickets that are related, and hope to work on the >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> third tomorrow.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> I had some feedback there, but I think folks were waiting >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> for the version integrated with the final form of the Lucene >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> tickets before delving further. Hopefully this week I can >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> start on a patch that does that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:25 AM Adrien Grand >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> <jpou...@gmail.com <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> I would like to backport LUCENE-9827 before we release 8.9, >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> a performance regression to stored fields merges. I'll work >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> on this as soon as possible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM Adrien Grand >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> <jpou...@gmail.com <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> Mayya, are you volunteering to be the release manager? >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 18:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> <mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:50 PM Mayya Sharipova >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>> <mailto:mayya.sharip...@elastic.co>.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> I was wondering if we can have a 8.9.0 release. It has >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> been more than 3 months since 8.8.0 was released. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> 8.9.0 doesn't need to be the last release in the 8.x >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> series. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> Adrien >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> <http://www.needhamsoftware.com/> (work) >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> http://www.the111shift.com <http://www.the111shift.com/> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> (play) >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com <http://www.needhamsoftware.com/> >>>>>>>>>> >>> (work) >>>>>>>>>> >>> http://www.the111shift.com <http://www.the111shift.com/> (play) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> Noble Paul >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >
