It’s OK with me, but I’m not really in a position to understand the changes and/or test it. And while we have a branch, I’m not clear on when the first RC is planned, so Mayya should weigh in I think.
Cassandra On Jun 3, 2021, 5:49 AM -0500, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>, wrote: > Mayya, Cassandra, I'd like to merge the Jetty upgrade, SOLR-15316 to > branch_8x and branch_8_9. See backport PR > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2502 > Is that ok? > > Jan > > > 2. jun. 2021 kl. 01:00 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>: > > > > Cassandra, > > > > Thanks for spotting the Jetty JIRA (SOLR-15316). I put up a quck PR for > > upgrading Jetty to 9.4.41.v20210516. Currently running all tests. > > Due to the CVEs I think there should not be a new Solr release without this > > upgrade. I set fixVersion to 8.9 and kept the blocker. If anyone disagrees, > > speak out. > > > > There's always a risk of a new Jetty version introducing new bugs, but this > > is a minor version upgrade with (almost) exclusively bug fixes since > > 9.4.36, so I'm willing to take the risk if tests look good. Perhaps Jenkins > > gets a few test spins on main before the 8.9 release too. Whyt Mayya? > > > > Jan > > > > > 1. jun. 2021 kl. 23:04 skrev Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > I got a question this morning about some Jetty CVEs that look to be fixed > > > with Jetty 9.4.39, and there’s an issue marked as a Blocker (with no > > > version) to upgrade to that version. Is there time to do that for 8.9? Or > > > is it too high risk or would take too long? > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15316 > > > > > > Sorry, I’m way behind on mailing lists and didn’t see the branch had been > > > cut already! > > > > > > Cassandra > > > On Jun 1, 2021, 3:54 PM -0500, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>, wrote: > > > > Let's not hold up the release due to this incomplete PR. It obviously > > > > needs more time for completion and there is always a new train to catch. > > > > As far as I understand, Circuit breakers are pluggable, so anyone can > > > > configure their own implementation in the meantime? > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > 1. jun. 2021 kl. 22:13 skrev Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > I appreciate you fixing this and adding the new circuit breaker and > > > > > look forward to having it in the hands of our users soon. > > > > > > > > > > However, the current state of PR, with significant API churn for a > > > > > single change and overlapping code is not yet ready. > > > > > > > > > > If this is too much of a rework, I am happy to take the existing PR > > > > > and do the changes, post which I believe the PR should be close to > > > > > completion. > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if you need me to help, but unfortunately, the two > > > > > objections I raised are blockers, atleast until we establish that > > > > > they cannot be done away with. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, 01:37 Walter Underwood, <wun...@wunderwood.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I would appreciate a second opinion on the pull request. > > > > > > > Substantive issues have been resolved. At this point, the > > > > > > > discussion is about code style and coding standards. I don’t have > > > > > > > detailed knowledge about the Solr coding style, so I’d appreciate > > > > > > > another set of eyes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The current behavior is buggy, and we are not able to use it at > > > > > > > Chegg. The patch fixes those bugs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wunder > > > > > > > Walter Underwood > > > > > > > wun...@wunderwood.org > > > > > > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Walter Underwood > > > > > > > > <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I answered the comments. I don’t see those answers on github, > > > > > > > > oddly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I’ll re-answer them. Most of your questions are already > > > > > > > > answered in the discussion on Jira. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I central issues is that load average is not always a CPU > > > > > > > > measure. In some systems, it includes threads in iowait. So it > > > > > > > > is potentially misleading to label it as CPU and document it as > > > > > > > > CPU. The updated documentation makes that clear, so that should > > > > > > > > have already answered your comment. that is why it is important > > > > > > > > to rename the existing circuit breaker. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wunder > > > > > > > > Walter Underwood > > > > > > > > wun...@wunderwood.org > > > > > > > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2021, at 12:20 PM, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tool a look at the PR and gave comments for SOLR-15056, and > > > > > > > > > the last I checked, my comments were not addressed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, 00:31 Walter Underwood, > > > > > > > > > > <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Could someone else please take a look at SOLR-15056? This > > > > > > > > > > > is a small blast radius change that improves the circuit > > > > > > > > > > > breakers. It includes unit tests and documentation and > > > > > > > > > > > has been ready since January. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96/files > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15056 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wunder > > > > > > > > > > > Walter Underwood > > > > > > > > > > > wun...@wunderwood.org > > > > > > > > > > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2021, at 11:53 AM, Mayya Sharipova > > > > > > > > > > > > <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.INVALID> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for the update, Houston. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've started the release process, the branch 8.9 is now > > > > > > > > > > > > cut. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:21 AM Houston Putman > > > > > > > > > > > > > <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mayya, SOLR-14978 is now in 8.x. So no longer a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blocker. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Houston > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:42 PM David Smiley > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SOLR-15412 is rather serious as the title > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggests. I haven't been tracking the progress > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so if it's already resolved, that's unknown to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > me and isn't reflected in JIRA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:24 PM Mayya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sharipova > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if everyone is ok for May 31st > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Monday) as the date for the feature freeze > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > date and branch cut? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've noticed that `releaseWizard.py` is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also asking for the length of feature > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > freeze. What is the custom length to put > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks like Lucene doesn't have any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unresolved issues for 8.9. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SOLR has: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - SOLR-15412 Strict validation on Replica > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > metadata can cause complete outage (Looks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like it may be resolved already?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - SOLR-15410 GC log is directed to console > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when starting Solr with Java 11 Open J9 on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Windows > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - SOLR-15056 CPU circuit breaker needs to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use CPU utilization, not Unix load average > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are we ok to postpone these issues to later > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > releases if they are not resolved and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > merged before feature freeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:41 PM Colvin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cowie <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eric was going to have a look at the PR. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But if it isn't done in time then I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't think it needs to block the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 15:50, Mayya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sharipova > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Colvin, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am wondering if you still want to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > merge SOLR-15410 for the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lucene/Solr 8.9 release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should we have a deadline for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > feature freeze? Say May 30th > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Sunday)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:30 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Colvin Cowie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I raised SOLR-15410 yesterday > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with a PR to fix an issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with GC logging when using > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new versions of OpenJ9. It's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > small, so if somebody could > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have a look at it in time for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8.9 that would be great > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Colvin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 17:52, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nhat Nguyen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co.invalid> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Mayya, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I would like to backport > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> LUCENE-9935, which enables > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> bulk-merge for stored fields > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> with index sort, to 8.x this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> weekend. The patch is ready, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> but we prefer to give CI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> some cycles before > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> backporting. Please let me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> know if it's okay with the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> release plan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Nhat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 12:44 PM Gus Heck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Perhaps > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> should be investigated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> before 8.9, maybe make it a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> blocker? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> 1:35 AM Robert Muir > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Mayya, I created backport > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> for Adrien's issue here, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> to try to help out: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Personally, I felt that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> merging non-trivial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> changes from main branch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> to 8.x has some additional > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> risks when cherry-picking: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * structural changes in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> main branch making merging > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> more difficult > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> (e.g. LUCENE-9705 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> reorganization of codec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> versioning, great change > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> moving forwards though) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * there are many style > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> changes due to spotless in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> main branch which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> add noise to merging > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> against old code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * In the specific case of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> LUCENE-9827, the usual > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> additional tricky > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> backwards compatibility > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> for 8.x must be added in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> the backport (due to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> minor version bumps there) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> which can go wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> I still think that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> particular change is worth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> considering for 8.9, it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> isn't just a performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> bug but also a huge > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> improvement to test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> coverage that helps combat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> risks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> But we should still take > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> some precautions when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> releasing an 8.x IMO: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * be mindful of what we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> are backporting and the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> risks involved: it is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> harder. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * try to let jenkins bake > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> changes in 8.x branches > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> for longer than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> usual? even a few days > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> really helps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1:29 PM Mayya Sharipova > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > Thanks everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > Adrien, I am happy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > try to be a release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > manager for this release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > Adrien, and Gus, please > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > let me know when your > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > changes are merged to 8.x > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > 10:38 AM Gus Heck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > <gus.h...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> I'm also looking to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> find time to get > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> into some sort of 8x. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> I've recently completed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> the back port of 2/3 of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> the lucene tickets that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> are related, and hope > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> to work on the third > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> tomorrow.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> I had some feedback > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> there, but I think > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> folks were waiting for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> the version integrated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> with the final form of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> the Lucene tickets > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> before delving further. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> Hopefully this week I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> can start on a patch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> that does that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> 10:25 AM Adrien Grand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> <jpou...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> I would like to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> backport LUCENE-9827 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> before we release 8.9, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> a performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> regression to stored > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> fields merges. I'll > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> work on this as soon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> 10:28 PM Adrien Grand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> <jpou...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> Mayya, are you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> volunteering to be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> the release manager? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> 18:06, Ishan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> Chattopadhyaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>> +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>> at 7:50 PM Mayya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>> Sharipova > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> I was wondering if > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> we can have a 8.9.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> release. It has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> been more than 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> months since 8.8.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> was released. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> 8.9.0 doesn't need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> to be the last > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> release in the 8.x > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>>>>> Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >>> Adrien > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> (work) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> http://www.the111shift.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> (play) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> For additional commands, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> (work) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> http://www.the111shift.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> (play) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Noble Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
