Hi again, short update to my previous mail:
New maven metadata artifacts work fine, I was able to build a Solr plugin of a
customer after adding 2 repos to its POM. It then downloaded the internet and
Solr and plugin built sucessfully (including tests using the solr test
framework, indirectly also testing lucene test framework):
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 02:27 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2021-06-15T19:44:09+02:00
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you want to try:
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>lucene</id>
<url>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/lucene/maven/</url>
</repository>
<repository>
<id>solr</id>
<url>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/solr/maven/</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
You can also try this out, but be sure to remove the dowloaded artifacts from
your local repository, if we need to respin the release process!
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 7:27 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1
>
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:24:00.227990]
>
> Policeman Jenkins tested it for me:
> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-
> Release-Tester/36/console
> I had not much time to do my own checks of targz artifacts, so I trust the
> technical workflow.
>
> I only checked the maven folders and verified that the new POM layout looks
> fine, but I did not do a test build of a Solr plugin this time (I did this
> before
> committing the change). The release artifacts are a bit complicated to use as
> it's 2 repos.
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [email protected]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Atri Sharma <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:00 PM
> > To: Lucene Dev <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1
> >
> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:32:12.04043]
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:27 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:36:12.056443]
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mayya Sharipova
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Robert for such detailed investigations.
> > >>
> > >> Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9 also had 2 recent failures. Failures are not
> > reproducible on my local machine.
> > >>
> > >> build #13: ant test -Dtestcase=SolrCloudReportersTest -
> > Dtests.method=testExplicitConfiguration -Dtests.seed=60FEAB39C2B47705 -
> > Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=ro-RO
> > -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Brazzaville -
> > Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8
> > >> build# 12: ant test -Dtestcase=LeaderTragicEventTest -
> > Dtests.method=testLeaderFailsOver -Dtests.seed=BB301A174F4BDB5 -
> > Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=sr-Latn-RS
> > -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Bissau -
> > Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 5:06 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> OK I managed to finally get this smoketester to pass on my machine, so
> > >>> for THIS release I will retract my -1 and change it to a +1.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have reset my system configuration back though, so we should really
> > >>> fix these test problems for the future.
> > >>>
> > >>> SUCCESS! [1:08:26.448122]
> > >>>
> > >>> There were a few compounding issues, I will break out some issues a
> > >>> bit later. I don't think they need to be blockers for THIS release,
> > >>> but let's please fix them! I can help try to dig on each one, but here
> > >>> are the biggest two problems:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. some solr tests don't obey their sandbox and fail with
> > >>> tests.workDir (if it is set in the user's build.properties). These
> > >>> tests try to access wrong parts of the filesystem which can cause
> > >>> tests to meddle with each other. obeying the test sandbox
> > >>> (tests.workDir) is important, it is how I prevent these tests from
> > >>> destroying my SSDs.
> > >>>
> > >>> 2. some solr HDFS tests will falsely fail if they "think" disk space
> > >>> is low (even when it is not running out). They dump megabytes of
> > >>> output, but this part is the key:
> > >>>
> > >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) [ ]
> > >>> o.a.h.h.s.b.BlockPlacementPolicy Failed to place enough replicas,
> > >>> still in need of 2 to reach 2 (unavailableStorages=[],
> > >>> storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK],
> > >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}, newBlock=true)
> > >>> For more information, please enable DEBUG log level on
> > >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.BlockPlacementPolicy
> > and
> > >>> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetworkTopology
> > >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) [ ]
> > >>> o.a.h.h.p.BlockStoragePolicy Failed to place enough replicas: expected
> > >>> size is 2 but only 0 storage types can be selected (replication=2,
> > >>> selected=[], unavailable=[DISK], removed=[DISK, DISK],
> > >>> policy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK],
> > >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]})
> > >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) [ ]
> > >>> o.a.h.h.s.b.BlockPlacementPolicy Failed to place enough replicas,
> > >>> still in need of 2 to reach 2 (unavailableStorages=[DISK],
> > >>> storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK],
> > >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}, newBlock=true)
> > >>> All required storage types are unavailable:
> > >>> unavailableStorages=[DISK], storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7,
> > >>> storageTypes=[DISK], creationFallbacks=[],
> > >>> replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}
> > >>> [junit4] 2> 1000961 WARN (Thread-2642) [ ]
> > >>> o.a.h.h.DataStreamer DataStreamer Exception
> > >>> [junit4] 2> =>
> > >>> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(java.io.IOException): File
> > >>> /testfile could only be written to 0 of the 1 minReplication nodes.
> > >>> There are 2 datanode(s) running and 2 node(s) are excluded in this
> > >>> operation.
> > >>>
> > >>> So I think these tests should be tweaked to not require gigabytes of
> > >>> free space to pass. (fix the threshold or whatever, or add an assume
> > >>> or something). I worked around the situation by temporarily
> > >>> repartitioning and giving them another gigabyte (!). In no event was
> > >>> there ever any danger of running out of space! They just falsely fail
> > >>> even when there are hundreds of MB available. Seems they have some
> > >>> kind of bogus threshold in the algorithm (e.g. inspecting percentages
> > >>> or something).
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > The tests also aren't "timing out". They are failing.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:21 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Ishan, no, they arent running out of resources, not even close. I
> > >>> > > have
> > >>> > > 20GB of ram and by default it is only using 3 JVMs.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Hi Rob, could it be possible that the tests are timing out on your
> > machine due to lack of resources? Can you try running them with just just
> > one
> > JVM at a time?
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > On Sat, 12 Jun, 2021, 8:20 pm Robert Muir, <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>> > > >>
> > >>> > > >> I ran smoketester yet one more time and again numerous tests
> > >>> > > >> fail:
> > >>> > > >>
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: A3FDDCE09965D7AE] (first
> > >>> > > >> 10
> > out of 18):
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] -
> > org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog (suite)
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >>
> > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HDFSCollectionsAPITest.testDataDirIsNotReused
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] -
> > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testBasic
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >>
> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testMultiThreaded
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest
> (suite)
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.te
> > stCanDistinguishBetweenFilesAndDirectories
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.te
> > stCanDeleteEmptyOrFullDirectories
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.te
> > stCanDeleteIndividualFiles
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >>
> >
> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.te
> > stArbitraryFileDataCanBeStoredAndRetrieved
> > >>> > > >> [junit4]
> > >>> > > >> [junit4]
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.72 .. 1241.80 = 1241.08s
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.67 .. 1198.72 = 1198.05s
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.91 .. 1198.75 = 1197.84s
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] Execution time total: 20 minutes 41 seconds
> > >>> > > >> [junit4] Tests summary: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests, 3
> > >>> > > >> suite-level errors, 15 errors, 1 failure, 2581 ignored (506
> > >>> > > >> assumptions)
> > >>> > > >>
> > >>> > > >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:52 AM Robert Muir
> <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>> > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > After nuking all settings (i simply removed the whole
> > >>> > > >> > lucene.build.properties in my homedir), it still fails. Seems
> > >>> > > >> > maybe
> > >>> > > >> > like less failures though?
> > >>> > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > I will upload logs to the JIRA issue.
> > >>> > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Completed [939/939 (4!)] on J2 in 383.02s, 2
> > >>> > > >> > tests, 1
> > >>> > > >> > failure <<< FAILURES!
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4]
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4]
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: AC205159663D0461]:
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] -
> > org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog
> > >>> > > >> > (suite)
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >> >
> org.apache.solr.core.HdfsDirectoryFactoryTest.testLocalityReporter
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] -
> > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testBasic
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >> >
> > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testMultiThreaded
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest
> > (suite)
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] -
> > >>> > > >> >
> > org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.TestLocalFSCloudBackupRestore.test
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4]
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4]
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J0: 0.68 .. 1197.30 = 1196.62s
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J1: 0.71 .. 1113.59 = 1112.89s
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J2: 0.68 .. 1406.83 = 1406.15s
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Execution time total: 23 minutes 26 seconds
> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Tests summary: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests,
> > >>> > > >> > 3
> > >>> > > >> > suite-level errors, 4 errors, 1 failure, 2457 ignored (517
> > >>> > > >> > assumptions)
> > >>> > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > BUILD FAILED
> > >>> > > >> >
> >
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un
> > pack/solr-8.9.0/solr/build.xml:231:
> > >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line:
> > >>> > > >> >
> >
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un
> > pack/solr-8.9.0/solr/common-build.xml:550:
> > >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line:
> > >>> > > >> >
> >
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un
> > pack/solr-8.9.0/lucene/common-build.xml:1608:
> > >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line:
> > >>> > > >> >
> >
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un
> > pack/solr-8.9.0/lucene/common-build.xml:1135:
> > >>> > > >> > There were test failures: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests, 3
> > >>> > > >> > suite-level errors, 4 errors, 1 failure, 2457 ignored (517
> > >>> > > >> > assumptions) [seed: AC205159663D0461]
> > >>> > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > Total time: 24 minutes 16 seconds
> > >>> > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-
> > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py",
> > >>> > > >> > line 1495, in <module>
> > >>> > > >> > main()
> > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-
> > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py",
> > >>> > > >> > line 1417, in main
> > >>> > > >> > smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> > >>> > > >> > c.is_signed, c.local_keys, ' '.join(c.test_args),
> > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-
> > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py",
> > >>> > > >> > line 1483, in smokeTest
> > >>> > > >> > solrSrcUnpackPath = unpackAndVerify(java, 'solr', tmpDir,
> > >>> > > >> > 'solr-%s-src.tgz' % version,
> > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-
> > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py",
> > >>> > > >> > line 566, in unpackAndVerify
> > >>> > > >> > verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath,
> > >>> > > >> > gitRevision,
> > >>> > > >> > version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
> > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-
> > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py",
> > >>> > > >> > line 687, in verifyUnpacked
> > >>> > > >> > java.run_java8('ant clean test -Dtests.slow=false %s' %
> testArgs,
> > >>> > > >> > '%s/test.log' % unpackPath)
> > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-
> > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py",
> > >>> > > >> > line 1212, in run_java
> > >>> > > >> > run('%s; %s' % (cmd_prefix, cmd), logfile)
> > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-
> > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py",
> > >>> > > >> > line 500, in run
> > >>> > > >> > raise RuntimeError('command "%s" failed; see log file %s' %
> > >>> > > >> > (command, logPath))
> > >>> > > >> > RuntimeError: command "export
> > >>> > > >> > JAVA_HOME="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08"
> > >>> > > >> > PATH="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08/bin:$PATH"
> > >>> > > >> > JAVACMD="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08/bin/java";
> ant
> > clean test
> > >>> > > >> > -Dtests.slow=false -Dtests.badapples=false " failed; see log
> > >>> > > >> > file
> > >>> > > >> >
> >
> /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un
> > pack/solr-8.9.0/test.log
> > >>> > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:47 AM Robert Muir
> <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>> > > >> > >
> > >>> > > >> > > I nuked all my settings and am rerunning with all defaults.
> > >>> > > >> > > I'll
> > >>> > > >> > > report back what happens/upload log when/if it finishes or
> fails.
> > >>> > > >> > >
> > >>> > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:45 AM Michael Sokolov
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > I tried to comment on the JIRA, but it seems to be timing
> > >>> > > >> > > > out.
> > Now
> > >>> > > >> > > > when I go back, SOLR issues are marked as "You can't view
> this
> > issue
> > >>> > > >> > > > It may have been deleted or you don't have permission to
> view
> > it."
> > >>> > > >> > > > Waat?
> > >>> > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > Anyway, Robert you suggested there that maybe the problem
> is
> > being
> > >>> > > >> > > > surfaced by using a different working directory for the
> > >>> > > >> > > > tests.
> Do
> > you
> > >>> > > >> > > > think that the tests need to be fixed so that they work
> > >>> > > >> > > > with
> this
> > >>> > > >> > > > tmp.workDir parameter? What if you were to cd to the place
> > you want to
> > >>> > > >> > > > use as the working dir and call the smokeTester from there?
> > >>> > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Mayya Sharipova
> > >>> > > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> > > >> > > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > > Thanks very much Robert for detailed investigations, and
> > thanks Jan for your tests.
> > >>> > > >> > > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > > I will sort out the problem with my GPG key, but I am
> > >>> > > >> > > > > not
> > sure what to do with this SOLR-15473. I've run the smoker test again, and it
> > passed on my Mac again: SUCCESS! [1:00:03.751500]
> > >>> > > >> > > > > Would appreciate more guidance, if we need to resolve
> SOLR-
> > 15473 before 8.9 release.
> > >>> > > >> > > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:09 AM Robert Muir
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> > > >> > > > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> Dude, if you can vote +1 when the smoketester passes,
> then
> > I can vote
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> -1 when it fails. This is my vote, not your vote. You
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> don't
> get
> > to
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> decide about it, or change it in any way.
> > >>> > > >> > > > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:04 AM Jan Høydahl
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > Does it reproduce for you? Are you suspecting a bug in
> Solr
> > that we cannot ship, or only a bug in the smoketester py itself? The -1
> > should
> > be about the released bits, not about other tooling?
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > My JVM is OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
> > (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.292-b10, mixed mode)
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > Jan
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > 11. jun. 2021 kl. 13:48 skrev Robert Muir
> > <[email protected]>:
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > Jan, I'm using the same automated smoketester as
> > everyone else. It
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > fails, so my vote is -1.
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jan Høydahl
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Tested on MacOS (Intel), No other verification than
> > smoketester done
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [1:08:19.953492]
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> +1
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Robert - not sure if one test-run failure should
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> cancel
> > the build. Our smoketester and tests are sometimes a bit picky, and does not
> > mean that the artifacts are faulty.
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Jan
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> 11. jun. 2021 kl. 04:14 skrev Mayya Sharipova
> > <[email protected]>:
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr
> > 8.9.0
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-
> > solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this
> > command:
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-
> > solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e.
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> until
> > 2021-06-16 02:00 UTC.
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Here is my +1
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [0:01:43.815224]
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> > [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> > [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> > [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> > [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> >
> > >>> > > >> > > > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> > [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> > > > >>
> > >>> > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> > > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > >>
> > >>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>> > > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Adrien
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Atri
> > Apache Concerted
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
