Ishan, no, they arent running out of resources, not even close. I have 20GB of ram and by default it is only using 3 JVMs.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Rob, could it be possible that the tests are timing out on your machine > due to lack of resources? Can you try running them with just just one JVM at > a time? > > On Sat, 12 Jun, 2021, 8:20 pm Robert Muir, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I ran smoketester yet one more time and again numerous tests fail: >> >> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: A3FDDCE09965D7AE] (first 10 out of >> 18): >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog (suite) >> [junit4] - >> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HDFSCollectionsAPITest.testDataDirIsNotReused >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testBasic >> [junit4] - >> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testMultiThreaded >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest (suite) >> [junit4] - >> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.testCanDistinguishBetweenFilesAndDirectories >> [junit4] - >> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.testCanDeleteEmptyOrFullDirectories >> [junit4] - >> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.testCanDeleteIndividualFiles >> [junit4] - >> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.testArbitraryFileDataCanBeStoredAndRetrieved >> [junit4] >> [junit4] >> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.72 .. 1241.80 = 1241.08s >> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.67 .. 1198.72 = 1198.05s >> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.91 .. 1198.75 = 1197.84s >> [junit4] Execution time total: 20 minutes 41 seconds >> [junit4] Tests summary: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests, 3 >> suite-level errors, 15 errors, 1 failure, 2581 ignored (506 >> assumptions) >> >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:52 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > After nuking all settings (i simply removed the whole >> > lucene.build.properties in my homedir), it still fails. Seems maybe >> > like less failures though? >> > >> > I will upload logs to the JIRA issue. >> > >> > [junit4] Completed [939/939 (4!)] on J2 in 383.02s, 2 tests, 1 >> > failure <<< FAILURES! >> > [junit4] >> > [junit4] >> > [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: AC205159663D0461]: >> > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety >> > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog (suite) >> > [junit4] - >> > org.apache.solr.core.HdfsDirectoryFactoryTest.testLocalityReporter >> > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testBasic >> > [junit4] - >> > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testMultiThreaded >> > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest (suite) >> > [junit4] - >> > org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.TestLocalFSCloudBackupRestore.test >> > [junit4] >> > [junit4] >> > [junit4] JVM J0: 0.68 .. 1197.30 = 1196.62s >> > [junit4] JVM J1: 0.71 .. 1113.59 = 1112.89s >> > [junit4] JVM J2: 0.68 .. 1406.83 = 1406.15s >> > [junit4] Execution time total: 23 minutes 26 seconds >> > [junit4] Tests summary: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests, 3 >> > suite-level errors, 4 errors, 1 failure, 2457 ignored (517 >> > assumptions) >> > >> > BUILD FAILED >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/solr/build.xml:231: >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/solr/common-build.xml:550: >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/lucene/common-build.xml:1608: >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/lucene/common-build.xml:1135: >> > There were test failures: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests, 3 >> > suite-level errors, 4 errors, 1 failure, 2457 ignored (517 >> > assumptions) [seed: AC205159663D0461] >> > >> > Total time: 24 minutes 16 seconds >> > >> > >> > Traceback (most recent call last): >> > File >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >> > line 1495, in <module> >> > main() >> > File >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >> > line 1417, in main >> > smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, >> > c.is_signed, c.local_keys, ' '.join(c.test_args), >> > File >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >> > line 1483, in smokeTest >> > solrSrcUnpackPath = unpackAndVerify(java, 'solr', tmpDir, >> > 'solr-%s-src.tgz' % version, >> > File >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >> > line 566, in unpackAndVerify >> > verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision, >> > version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL) >> > File >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >> > line 687, in verifyUnpacked >> > java.run_java8('ant clean test -Dtests.slow=false %s' % testArgs, >> > '%s/test.log' % unpackPath) >> > File >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >> > line 1212, in run_java >> > run('%s; %s' % (cmd_prefix, cmd), logfile) >> > File >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >> > line 500, in run >> > raise RuntimeError('command "%s" failed; see log file %s' % >> > (command, logPath)) >> > RuntimeError: command "export >> > JAVA_HOME="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08" >> > PATH="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08/bin:$PATH" >> > JAVACMD="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08/bin/java"; ant clean test >> > -Dtests.slow=false -Dtests.badapples=false " failed; see log file >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/test.log >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:47 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > I nuked all my settings and am rerunning with all defaults. I'll >> > > report back what happens/upload log when/if it finishes or fails. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:45 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > I tried to comment on the JIRA, but it seems to be timing out. Now >> > > > when I go back, SOLR issues are marked as "You can't view this issue >> > > > It may have been deleted or you don't have permission to view it." >> > > > Waat? >> > > > >> > > > Anyway, Robert you suggested there that maybe the problem is being >> > > > surfaced by using a different working directory for the tests. Do you >> > > > think that the tests need to be fixed so that they work with this >> > > > tmp.workDir parameter? What if you were to cd to the place you want to >> > > > use as the working dir and call the smokeTester from there? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Mayya Sharipova >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks very much Robert for detailed investigations, and thanks Jan >> > > > > for your tests. >> > > > > >> > > > > I will sort out the problem with my GPG key, but I am not sure what >> > > > > to do with this SOLR-15473. I've run the smoker test again, and it >> > > > > passed on my Mac again: SUCCESS! [1:00:03.751500] >> > > > > Would appreciate more guidance, if we need to resolve SOLR-15473 >> > > > > before 8.9 release. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:09 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Dude, if you can vote +1 when the smoketester passes, then I can >> > > > >> vote >> > > > >> -1 when it fails. This is my vote, not your vote. You don't get to >> > > > >> decide about it, or change it in any way. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:04 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >> > > > >> wrote: >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Does it reproduce for you? Are you suspecting a bug in Solr that >> > > > >> > we cannot ship, or only a bug in the smoketester py itself? The >> > > > >> > -1 should be about the released bits, not about other tooling? >> > > > >> > My JVM is OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build >> > > > >> > 25.292-b10, mixed mode) >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Jan >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > 11. jun. 2021 kl. 13:48 skrev Robert Muir <[email protected]>: >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Jan, I'm using the same automated smoketester as everyone else. >> > > > >> > > It >> > > > >> > > fails, so my vote is -1. >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jan Høydahl >> > > > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> Tested on MacOS (Intel), No other verification than >> > > > >> > >> smoketester done >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [1:08:19.953492] >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> +1 >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> Robert - not sure if one test-run failure should cancel the >> > > > >> > >> build. Our smoketester and tests are sometimes a bit picky, >> > > > >> > >> and does not mean that the artifacts are faulty. >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> Jan >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> 11. jun. 2021 kl. 04:14 skrev Mayya Sharipova >> > > > >> > >> <[email protected]>: >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80 >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80 >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until >> > > > >> > >> 2021-06-16 02:00 UTC. >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve >> > > > >> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> > > > >> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> Here is my +1 >> > > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [0:01:43.815224] >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
