+1 SUCCESS! [1:32:12.04043] On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:27 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:36:12.056443] > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mayya Sharipova > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks Robert for such detailed investigations. >> >> Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9 also had 2 recent failures. Failures are not >> reproducible on my local machine. >> >> build #13: ant test -Dtestcase=SolrCloudReportersTest >> -Dtests.method=testExplicitConfiguration -Dtests.seed=60FEAB39C2B47705 >> -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=ro-RO >> -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Brazzaville -Dtests.asserts=true >> -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 >> build# 12: ant test -Dtestcase=LeaderTragicEventTest >> -Dtests.method=testLeaderFailsOver -Dtests.seed=BB301A174F4BDB5 >> -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=sr-Latn-RS >> -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Bissau -Dtests.asserts=true >> -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1 >> >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 5:06 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> OK I managed to finally get this smoketester to pass on my machine, so >>> for THIS release I will retract my -1 and change it to a +1. >>> >>> I have reset my system configuration back though, so we should really >>> fix these test problems for the future. >>> >>> SUCCESS! [1:08:26.448122] >>> >>> There were a few compounding issues, I will break out some issues a >>> bit later. I don't think they need to be blockers for THIS release, >>> but let's please fix them! I can help try to dig on each one, but here >>> are the biggest two problems: >>> >>> 1. some solr tests don't obey their sandbox and fail with >>> tests.workDir (if it is set in the user's build.properties). These >>> tests try to access wrong parts of the filesystem which can cause >>> tests to meddle with each other. obeying the test sandbox >>> (tests.workDir) is important, it is how I prevent these tests from >>> destroying my SSDs. >>> >>> 2. some solr HDFS tests will falsely fail if they "think" disk space >>> is low (even when it is not running out). They dump megabytes of >>> output, but this part is the key: >>> >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) [ ] >>> o.a.h.h.s.b.BlockPlacementPolicy Failed to place enough replicas, >>> still in need of 2 to reach 2 (unavailableStorages=[], >>> storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK], >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}, newBlock=true) >>> For more information, please enable DEBUG log level on >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.BlockPlacementPolicy and >>> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetworkTopology >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) [ ] >>> o.a.h.h.p.BlockStoragePolicy Failed to place enough replicas: expected >>> size is 2 but only 0 storage types can be selected (replication=2, >>> selected=[], unavailable=[DISK], removed=[DISK, DISK], >>> policy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK], >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}) >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) [ ] >>> o.a.h.h.s.b.BlockPlacementPolicy Failed to place enough replicas, >>> still in need of 2 to reach 2 (unavailableStorages=[DISK], >>> storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK], >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}, newBlock=true) >>> All required storage types are unavailable: >>> unavailableStorages=[DISK], storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, >>> storageTypes=[DISK], creationFallbacks=[], >>> replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]} >>> [junit4] 2> 1000961 WARN (Thread-2642) [ ] >>> o.a.h.h.DataStreamer DataStreamer Exception >>> [junit4] 2> => >>> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(java.io.IOException): File >>> /testfile could only be written to 0 of the 1 minReplication nodes. >>> There are 2 datanode(s) running and 2 node(s) are excluded in this >>> operation. >>> >>> So I think these tests should be tweaked to not require gigabytes of >>> free space to pass. (fix the threshold or whatever, or add an assume >>> or something). I worked around the situation by temporarily >>> repartitioning and giving them another gigabyte (!). In no event was >>> there ever any danger of running out of space! They just falsely fail >>> even when there are hundreds of MB available. Seems they have some >>> kind of bogus threshold in the algorithm (e.g. inspecting percentages >>> or something). >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > The tests also aren't "timing out". They are failing. >>> > >>> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:21 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Ishan, no, they arent running out of resources, not even close. I have >>> > > 20GB of ram and by default it is only using 3 JVMs. >>> > > >>> > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > Hi Rob, could it be possible that the tests are timing out on your >>> > > > machine due to lack of resources? Can you try running them with just >>> > > > just one JVM at a time? >>> > > > >>> > > > On Sat, 12 Jun, 2021, 8:20 pm Robert Muir, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >> >>> > > >> I ran smoketester yet one more time and again numerous tests fail: >>> > > >> >>> > > >> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: A3FDDCE09965D7AE] (first 10 >>> > > >> out of 18): >>> > > >> [junit4] - >>> > > >> org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety >>> > > >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog (suite) >>> > > >> [junit4] - >>> > > >> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HDFSCollectionsAPITest.testDataDirIsNotReused >>> > > >> [junit4] - >>> > > >> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testBasic >>> > > >> [junit4] - >>> > > >> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testMultiThreaded >>> > > >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest >>> > > >> (suite) >>> > > >> [junit4] - >>> > > >> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.testCanDistinguishBetweenFilesAndDirectories >>> > > >> [junit4] - >>> > > >> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.testCanDeleteEmptyOrFullDirectories >>> > > >> [junit4] - >>> > > >> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.testCanDeleteIndividualFiles >>> > > >> [junit4] - >>> > > >> org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.testArbitraryFileDataCanBeStoredAndRetrieved >>> > > >> [junit4] >>> > > >> [junit4] >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.72 .. 1241.80 = 1241.08s >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.67 .. 1198.72 = 1198.05s >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.91 .. 1198.75 = 1197.84s >>> > > >> [junit4] Execution time total: 20 minutes 41 seconds >>> > > >> [junit4] Tests summary: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests, 3 >>> > > >> suite-level errors, 15 errors, 1 failure, 2581 ignored (506 >>> > > >> assumptions) >>> > > >> >>> > > >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:52 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> >>> > > >> wrote: >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > After nuking all settings (i simply removed the whole >>> > > >> > lucene.build.properties in my homedir), it still fails. Seems maybe >>> > > >> > like less failures though? >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > I will upload logs to the JIRA issue. >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Completed [939/939 (4!)] on J2 in 383.02s, 2 tests, 1 >>> > > >> > failure <<< FAILURES! >>> > > >> > [junit4] >>> > > >> > [junit4] >>> > > >> > [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: AC205159663D0461]: >>> > > >> > [junit4] - >>> > > >> > org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety >>> > > >> > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog (suite) >>> > > >> > [junit4] - >>> > > >> > org.apache.solr.core.HdfsDirectoryFactoryTest.testLocalityReporter >>> > > >> > [junit4] - >>> > > >> > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testBasic >>> > > >> > [junit4] - >>> > > >> > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testMultiThreaded >>> > > >> > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest >>> > > >> > (suite) >>> > > >> > [junit4] - >>> > > >> > org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.TestLocalFSCloudBackupRestore.test >>> > > >> > [junit4] >>> > > >> > [junit4] >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J0: 0.68 .. 1197.30 = 1196.62s >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J1: 0.71 .. 1113.59 = 1112.89s >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J2: 0.68 .. 1406.83 = 1406.15s >>> > > >> > [junit4] Execution time total: 23 minutes 26 seconds >>> > > >> > [junit4] Tests summary: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests, 3 >>> > > >> > suite-level errors, 4 errors, 1 failure, 2457 ignored (517 >>> > > >> > assumptions) >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > BUILD FAILED >>> > > >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/solr/build.xml:231: >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: >>> > > >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/solr/common-build.xml:550: >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: >>> > > >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/lucene/common-build.xml:1608: >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: >>> > > >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/lucene/common-build.xml:1135: >>> > > >> > There were test failures: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 tests, 3 >>> > > >> > suite-level errors, 4 errors, 1 failure, 2457 ignored (517 >>> > > >> > assumptions) [seed: AC205159663D0461] >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > Total time: 24 minutes 16 seconds >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > Traceback (most recent call last): >>> > > >> > File >>> > > >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >>> > > >> > line 1495, in <module> >>> > > >> > main() >>> > > >> > File >>> > > >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >>> > > >> > line 1417, in main >>> > > >> > smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, >>> > > >> > c.is_signed, c.local_keys, ' '.join(c.test_args), >>> > > >> > File >>> > > >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >>> > > >> > line 1483, in smokeTest >>> > > >> > solrSrcUnpackPath = unpackAndVerify(java, 'solr', tmpDir, >>> > > >> > 'solr-%s-src.tgz' % version, >>> > > >> > File >>> > > >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >>> > > >> > line 566, in unpackAndVerify >>> > > >> > verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, >>> > > >> > gitRevision, >>> > > >> > version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL) >>> > > >> > File >>> > > >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >>> > > >> > line 687, in verifyUnpacked >>> > > >> > java.run_java8('ant clean test -Dtests.slow=false %s' % >>> > > >> > testArgs, >>> > > >> > '%s/test.log' % unpackPath) >>> > > >> > File >>> > > >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >>> > > >> > line 1212, in run_java >>> > > >> > run('%s; %s' % (cmd_prefix, cmd), logfile) >>> > > >> > File >>> > > >> > "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", >>> > > >> > line 500, in run >>> > > >> > raise RuntimeError('command "%s" failed; see log file %s' % >>> > > >> > (command, logPath)) >>> > > >> > RuntimeError: command "export >>> > > >> > JAVA_HOME="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08" >>> > > >> > PATH="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08/bin:$PATH" >>> > > >> > JAVACMD="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08/bin/java"; ant clean >>> > > >> > test >>> > > >> > -Dtests.slow=false -Dtests.badapples=false " failed; see log file >>> > > >> > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/unpack/solr-8.9.0/test.log >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:47 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> >>> > > >> > wrote: >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > I nuked all my settings and am rerunning with all defaults. I'll >>> > > >> > > report back what happens/upload log when/if it finishes or fails. >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:45 AM Michael Sokolov >>> > > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > I tried to comment on the JIRA, but it seems to be timing out. >>> > > >> > > > Now >>> > > >> > > > when I go back, SOLR issues are marked as "You can't view this >>> > > >> > > > issue >>> > > >> > > > It may have been deleted or you don't have permission to view >>> > > >> > > > it." >>> > > >> > > > Waat? >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > Anyway, Robert you suggested there that maybe the problem is >>> > > >> > > > being >>> > > >> > > > surfaced by using a different working directory for the tests. >>> > > >> > > > Do you >>> > > >> > > > think that the tests need to be fixed so that they work with >>> > > >> > > > this >>> > > >> > > > tmp.workDir parameter? What if you were to cd to the place you >>> > > >> > > > want to >>> > > >> > > > use as the working dir and call the smokeTester from there? >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Mayya Sharipova >>> > > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > Thanks very much Robert for detailed investigations, and >>> > > >> > > > > thanks Jan for your tests. >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > I will sort out the problem with my GPG key, but I am not >>> > > >> > > > > sure what to do with this SOLR-15473. I've run the smoker >>> > > >> > > > > test again, and it passed on my Mac again: SUCCESS! >>> > > >> > > > > [1:00:03.751500] >>> > > >> > > > > Would appreciate more guidance, if we need to resolve >>> > > >> > > > > SOLR-15473 before 8.9 release. >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:09 AM Robert Muir >>> > > >> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >> > > > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> Dude, if you can vote +1 when the smoketester passes, then >>> > > >> > > > >> I can vote >>> > > >> > > > >> -1 when it fails. This is my vote, not your vote. You don't >>> > > >> > > > >> get to >>> > > >> > > > >> decide about it, or change it in any way. >>> > > >> > > > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:04 AM Jan Høydahl >>> > > >> > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > Does it reproduce for you? Are you suspecting a bug in >>> > > >> > > > >> > Solr that we cannot ship, or only a bug in the >>> > > >> > > > >> > smoketester py itself? The -1 should be about the >>> > > >> > > > >> > released bits, not about other tooling? >>> > > >> > > > >> > My JVM is OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build >>> > > >> > > > >> > 25.292-b10, mixed mode) >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > Jan >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > 11. jun. 2021 kl. 13:48 skrev Robert Muir >>> > > >> > > > >> > > <[email protected]>: >>> > > >> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > Jan, I'm using the same automated smoketester as >>> > > >> > > > >> > > everyone else. It >>> > > >> > > > >> > > fails, so my vote is -1. >>> > > >> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jan Høydahl >>> > > >> > > > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Tested on MacOS (Intel), No other verification than >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> smoketester done >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [1:08:19.953492] >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> +1 >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Robert - not sure if one test-run failure should >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> cancel the build. Our smoketester and tests are >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> sometimes a bit picky, and does not mean that the >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> artifacts are faulty. >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Jan >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> 11. jun. 2021 kl. 04:14 skrev Mayya Sharipova >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> <[email protected]>: >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> 8.9.0 >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80 >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> command: >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80 >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> 2021-06-16 02:00 UTC. >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Here is my +1 >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [0:01:43.815224] >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >> > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> > > >> > > > >> > > [email protected] >>> > > >> > > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: >>> > > >> > > > >> > > [email protected] >>> > > >> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > >> > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: >>> > > >> > > > >> > [email protected] >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> >>> > > >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > >> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > >> > > > >> >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > >> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > > -- > Adrien
-- Regards, Atri Apache Concerted --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
