I agree with Robert here, this makes little sense as there is no tooling in this repository to release solr without lucene. If it ever happens it will probably be done outside.
The idea of "leaving a door open" has no justification because it is more "drawing a door in a wall" and might give false expectations. +1 to remove the branch. On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 12:52 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > I gave my technical justification: our backwards compatibility testing > doesnt work this way. 9.0 can't have guaranteed back compat with > versions coming in the future. This is lunacy. > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 6:30 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto > > > > "To prevent vetoes from being used capriciously, the voter must provide > with the veto a *technical justification* showing why the change is bad > (opens a security exposure, negatively affects performance, etc. ). A veto > without a justification is invalid and has no weight." > > > > On Sun, 21 Nov, 2021, 3:30 pm Robert Muir, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I think we should remove this branch. > >> > >> personally, i'll probably -1 any commit to it. I'll see if i can > >> automate such an email response with a gmail rule. > >> > >> we already released lucene 9.0, we can't change backwards > >> compatibility for some 8.12, same old story, lets move on people. > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:29 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Uwe brought up the question on a the vote thread: we are not going to > do a 8.12 release, so what should we do of branch_8x? > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
