This vote has failed, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234 .
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:43 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: > Re-reading I think I misunderstood. I thought somewhere it was said that > git repo was needed to build which I would consider important, but I guess > that was just re-building the src tarball itself that required it. > > If the existing src tarball is sufficient to produce a working server > based solely on instructions in the README.md I have no further concerns. > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:03 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The basic build steps are included in the readme, Gus - >> https://github.com/apache/lucene/#building-with-gradle >> >> Is your comment about moving it to a separate file or about the >> instructions to build the package in general? If it's the latter then >> I think it's fine? >> >> Dawid >> >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:16 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Not suggesting it's a show stopper, just that this would be an easily >> found and consumed way to document the information revealed in this >> discussion. >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:13 AM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> The same applies for the historical time. It was never possible to do >> a full release with only the source tarball. >> >> >> >> The only thing that does not work is: assembleSourceRelease, because >> it requires "git archive" to build the src.tgz. But why should anybody do >> this? You have a src.tgz already why create another one from itsself? >> >> >> >> You can create a binary release without problems (at least that worked >> yesterday), it will just not have a git hash in the metadata of JAR files >> (and so on). But the version number is always "SNAPSHOT" unless you define >> your own (we do this to prevent "unauthorized artifacts created >> accidentally). If somebody wants to release a custom Lucene with patches, >> one can pass -Dversion.suffix="Ubuntu20.04-foobar" to make a customized >> release. >> >> >> >> Uwe >> >> >> >> ----- >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> >> >> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 1:33 PM >> >> > To: Lucene Dev <[email protected]> >> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3 >> >> > >> >> > I don't think it's a showstopper. This applies to any 9x branch - >> >> > perhaps starting from main. We can extract these instructions into a >> >> > separate document. On the other hand, it wouldn't be shown up there >> on >> >> > github front-page then... and times have changed - this is where most >> >> > folks would probably end up reading the instructions, not the source >> >> > bundle? >> >> > >> >> > D. >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:01 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > Seems to me the details for how to turn a src tarball into >> something that can >> >> > be compiled should go in a BUILDING.txt file? >> >> > > >> >> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 3:00 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected] >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> SUCCESS! [0:17:23.949074] >> >> > >> >> >> > >> +1. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> D. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:31 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev- >> >> > 1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev- >> >> > 1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-30 9:00 UTC. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve >> >> > >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Here is my +1. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > -- >> >> > >> > Adrien >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > -- >> >> > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> >> > > http://www.the111shift.com (play) >> >> > >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> > http://www.the111shift.com (play) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > http://www.the111shift.com (play) > -- Adrien
