> This one https://github.com/mocobeta/forks-migration-test-2/issues/8964
> seems to be missing its attachment - not sure if this was expected
> with this round? EG
Yes, I need to explain it.
Currently, all attachments are disappeared since I just moved all
attachments to another branch ("gh-pages") to use GitHub Pages for hosting
static contents (images, etc.)
https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/141
On the actual migration, all attachments should be correctly shown/ able to
be downloaded.
e.g.) https://github.com/mocobeta/forks-migration-test-2/issues/10628
(LUCENE-9004)
Tomoko
2022年8月9日(火) 20:49 Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com>:
> Yes, looks amazing! All I could find was:
>
> This one https://github.com/mocobeta/forks-migration-test-2/issues/8964
> seems to be missing its attachment - not sure if this was expected
> with this round? EG
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/attachments/attachments/LUCENE-9004/hnsw_layered_graph.png
> gives a 404. I know you were planning to use GH pages instead of that
> raw content stuff, so I guess this should be resolved with another
> round? Although I'm a bit surprised that the attachment would have
> disappeared
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 6:56 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tomoko,
> >
> > this looks all great! Go ahead and thanks for taking care. I will follow
> the INFRA issue during my vacation.
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > Am 08.08.2022 um 17:42 schrieb Tomoko Uchida:
> >
> > Hi,
> > this is the latest iteration of the migrations test.
> > https://github.com/mocobeta/forks-migration-test-2/issues
> >
> > I fixed a few conversion errors I noticed on that, but there should
> remain glitches that are relatively easy to fix I didn't notice.
> > Please pick one or two of your memorial issues and if they are correctly
> converted into Markdown (i.e. can be used as references for future usage)
> when you have some time.
> >
> > We cannot iterate the time-consuming test forever. I plan to run the
> final iteration this week.
> >
> > Tomoko
> >
> >
> > 2022年7月31日(日) 18:21 Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 8:47 PM Tomoko Uchida <
> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> > Is it intentional that we do not set Assignees on migration?
> >>>
> >>> You can assign a GitHub account only when it has push access to the
> repository; it was infeasible to give push access to all committers to the
> test repo (an invite/accept flow is needed for each committer).
> >>> Assignees will be set when the actual migration on apache/lucene repo
> - every assignee in Jira should have push access to it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Woops OK thanks Tomoko! I think you explained this already at least
> two times now, sorry ;)
> >>
> >> Mike McCandless
> >>
> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> > --
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
