Ok, so what should we do then? This space is moving fast, and in my opinion we should act fast to release and guarantee we attract as many users as possible.
At the same time I am not saying we should proceed blind, if there's concrete evidence for setting a limit rather than another, or that a certain limit is detrimental to the project, I think that veto should be valid. We shouldn't accept weakly/not scientifically motivated vetos anyway right? The problem I see is that more than voting we should first decide this limit and I don't know how we can operate. I am imagining like a poll where each entry is a limit + motivation and PMCs maybe vote/add entries? Did anything similar happen in the past? How was the current limit added? On Wed, 5 Apr 2023, 14:50 Dawid Weiss, <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Should create a VOTE thread, where we propose some values with a >> justification and we vote? >> > > Technically, a vote thread won't help much if there's no full consensus - > a single veto will make the patch unacceptable for merging. > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto > > Dawid > >
