I don't understand use of the word corruption, isn't it just a bug in intersect() that only affects wildcards etc? e.g. its not gonna merge into new segments or impact written data in any way.
And i don't think we should rushout some bugfix release without any test for this? On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 5:30 AM Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote: > > Based on the discussions in https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12895 , > it seems like reverting the change that caused the corruption on read is the > quickest fix, so that we can speed up releasing 9.9.1. I opened a PR for > that: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12899. Is there additional > testing that needs to be done to ensure that this is enough to address the > corruption? > > Regarding a fix for the JVM SIGSEGV crash, how far are we from a fix that > protects Lucene from it? Should we wait for that to be included in 9.9.1? > Asking because the corruption above looks like it needs to be addressed > rather quickly. It would be great to include both, but I don't know how long > that delays 9.9.1. > > Cheers > Luca > > > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 11:13 AM Chris Hegarty > <christopher.hega...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: >> >> Oh, and I’m happy to be Release Manager for 9.9.1 (given my recent >> experience on 9.9.0) >> >> -Chris. >> >> > On 9 Dec 2023, at 09:09, Chris Hegarty <christopher.hega...@elastic.co> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > We’ve encounter two very serious issues with the recent Lucene 9.9.0 >> > release, both of which (even if taken by themselves) would warrant a >> > 9.9.1. The issues are: >> > >> > 1. https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12895 - Corruption read on term >> > dictionaries in Lucene 9.9 >> > >> > 2. https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12898 - JVM SIGSEGV crash when >> > compiling computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram Lucene 9.9.0 >> > >> > There is still a little investigation and work left to bring these issues >> > to a point where we’re comfortable with proposing a solution. I would be >> > hopeful that we’ll get there by early next week. If so, then a Lucene >> > 9.9.1 release can be proposed. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -Chris. >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
