Hi Chris,
I think we should also regenerate the FSTs for 9.9.1?
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12924
Thanks,
Mike
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 7:54 AM Guo Feng <guof...@apache.org> wrote:
> Heads up:
>
> The bug fix PR (https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12900) has been
> merged to main, and backported to lucene_9x & lucene_9_9.
>
> On 2023/12/11 20:27:48 Chris Hegarty wrote:
> > Just a quick update on this...
> >
> > > On 9 Dec 2023, at 09:09, Chris Hegarty <christopher.hega...@elastic.co>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We’ve encounter two very serious issues with the recent Lucene 9.9.0
> release, both of which (even if taken by themselves) would warrant a 9.9.1.
> The issues are:
> > >
> > > 1. https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12895 - Corruption read on
> term dictionaries in Lucene 9.9
> >
> > Great work has been done re-adding tests, creating a new test to
> reproduce, and also working on an underlying fix. It feels like we’re
> getting close! :-)
> >
> > > 2. https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12898 - JVM SIGSEGV crash
> when compiling computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram Lucene 9.9.0
> >
> > Merged to branch_9_9.
> >
> > Once no.1 is merged, I’ll build a 9.9.1 RC1 and start a vote.
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
