Heads up:

The bug fix PR (https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12900) has been merged to 
main, and backported to lucene_9x & lucene_9_9.

On 2023/12/11 20:27:48 Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Just a quick update on this...
> 
> > On 9 Dec 2023, at 09:09, Chris Hegarty <christopher.hega...@elastic.co> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We’ve encounter two very serious issues with the recent Lucene 9.9.0 
> > release, both of which (even if taken by themselves) would warrant a 9.9.1. 
> > The issues are:
> > 
> > 1. https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12895 - Corruption read on term 
> > dictionaries in Lucene 9.9
> 
> Great work has been done re-adding tests, creating a new test to reproduce, 
> and also working on an underlying fix. It feels like we’re getting close! :-) 
> 
> > 2. https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12898 - JVM SIGSEGV crash when 
> > compiling computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram Lucene 9.9.0
> 
> Merged to branch_9_9.
> 
> Once no.1 is merged, I’ll build a 9.9.1 RC1 and start a vote.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to