[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166290#comment-13166290
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3622:
-------------------------------------
I think it does: we need to use the simplest naming possible within the core
api (especially for core index features).
Just like we have Field (and there is java.lang.reflect.Field) and Document
(and there is org.w3c.dom.Document) and we use Term and other short names.
> separate IndexDocValues interface from implementation
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3622
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-3622.patch
>
>
> Currently the o.a.l.index.values contains both the abstract apis and
> Lucene40's current implementation.
> I think we should move the implementation underneath Lucene40Codec, leaving
> only the abstract apis.
> For example, simpletext might have a different implementation, and we might
> make a int8 implementation
> underneath preflexcodec to support norms.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
