[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13242185#comment-13242185
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3930:
-------------------------------------
Don't we need to get rid of the binary JAR anyway? If so, the alternatives are
to either put all the sources in lucene repo or push a maven release of that
JAR. SonaType accepts third-party JAR pushes too -- one can do it as a last
resort option.
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Uploading+3rd-party+Artifacts+to+The+Central+Repository
> nuke jars from source tree and use ivy
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3930
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: general/build
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.6
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3930-skip-sources-javadoc.patch,
> LUCENE-3930-solr-example.patch, LUCENE-3930-solr-example.patch,
> LUCENE-3930.patch, LUCENE-3930.patch, LUCENE-3930.patch,
> LUCENE-3930__ivy_bootstrap_target.patch, ant_-verbose_clean_test.out.txt,
> noggit-commons-csv.patch, patch-jetty-build.patch
>
>
> As mentioned on the ML thread: "switch jars to ivy mechanism?".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
