and there's no way to estimate a difference for a bigger sample?
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > This doesn't work because the correct value for a sub-sampled batch will be > smaller than for a full data set. > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> if it >> makes sense to find a better guess for lambda by just doing an R >> simulation on a randomly subsampled data before putting it into >> pipeline? or there's a fundamental problem with this approach? >>
