Well it looks like lucene people were talking about custom javadoc tags, not annotations.
i did a brief scan and it looks like it would require a specific doclet developed to handle annotations. Documentation is not terribly clear what of standard doclets to subclass. just a custom javadoc tag would be easy though bit it would be visible to javadoc tool only (and not even IDEs, so typo-prone). Maybe that's what we need, but the trend in the rest of hadoop world seems to be to use annotation-driven markers in this case. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. Could be due to my lacking maven skills :) > > > On 22.12.2011 21:33, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >> you mean you couldn't make them come up in javadocs? >> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> wrote: >>> There is still a ticket open for those -> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831. I tried to integrate >>> the javadoc "annotations" like proposed by the lucene guys, but for some >>> reason I didn't get them working. Would be great if someone could help here. >>> >>> --sebastian >>> >>> On 22.12.2011 21:03, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> what happened to these annotations to mark maturity level? Did we ever >>>> commit those? >>>> >>>> thank you. >>> >
