We just use @lucene.experimental (or something like that) On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> Well it looks like lucene people were talking about custom javadoc > tags, not annotations. > > i did a brief scan and it looks like it would require a specific > doclet developed to handle annotations. Documentation is not terribly > clear what of standard doclets to subclass. > > just a custom javadoc tag would be easy though bit it would be visible > to javadoc tool only (and not even IDEs, so typo-prone). Maybe that's > what we need, but the trend in the rest of hadoop world seems to be to > use annotation-driven markers in this case. > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes. Could be due to my lacking maven skills :) >> >> >> On 22.12.2011 21:33, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >>> you mean you couldn't make them come up in javadocs? >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> There is still a ticket open for those -> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831. I tried to integrate >>>> the javadoc "annotations" like proposed by the lucene guys, but for some >>>> reason I didn't get them working. Would be great if someone could help >>>> here. >>>> >>>> --sebastian >>>> >>>> On 22.12.2011 21:03, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> what happened to these annotations to mark maturity level? Did we ever >>>>> commit those? >>>>> >>>>> thank you. >>>> >> -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
